English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

The civil war was unique in American history in the fact that it was the only war to literally pit brother against brother. There were families ripped apart because of geography and loyalties. There are even stories of brothers meeting face to face on the battlefields. Some of the battles, ie Antietam and Gettysburg, saw devastating amounts of casualties.

For the civilians, much of it depended on where they lived. For people in the New England areas, they lost loved ones, and much of the male work force, but they did not see fighting in their backyards, so to speak. And, they had increased manufacturing demands for weapons, munitions, food stuffs, and clothing. In the south, many families were displaced due to fighting, the entire way of life was disrupted as the slaves fled and were freed, and the southern population had a much smaller contingent of men available to start with. They relied heavily on imports, and the blockades in the south cut off much of the supplies they needed. They had very little manufacturing, as their main economy was cotton, sugar, and tobacco production. Southern civilians were affected much more drastically than northern civilians, overall.

After the war, many southerners could not continue to farm their lands to profits, as their slave labor was gone, and the northern carpet baggers exploited them to the fullest. Many families lost their property, and essentially, their entire way of life.

2007-03-19 15:24:41 · answer #1 · answered by steddy voter 6 · 0 0

about 1/2 the slaves in the south did belong to unfavourable farmers. no longer all slave vendors were wealthy plantation vendors. so that that they had an activity in protecting the equipment. And besides, in spite of in the journey that they weren't slave vendors themselves, that did not unavoidably recommend that they disapproved of the equipment. they could nevertheless experience loyalty to the south in spite of in the journey that they did not own slaves. In 'united states's women human beings' Gail Collins writes about the slaves of unfavourable human beings: '1/2 the Southern slaves worked for small farmers, who lived in houses in undemanding words slightly more beneficial mind-blowing than the slave cabins on tremendous plantations. White women human beings on small Southern farms worked highly not straightforward, and at the same time as a farmer became rich adequate to receive a slave, his first purchase replaced into oftentimes a woman to help his spouse. "That particular replaced into not straightforward living there" recalled Mary Lindsay, who replaced into the in undemanding words slave of a unfavourable white blacksmith. "I even ought to face up at 3 o'clock each each now and then so I actually have time to water the horses and slop the hogs and feed the chickens and milk the cows and then come back to the homestead and get the breakfast." A former slave in Nashville whose draw close employed her out to a operating-classification relatives suggested that she replaced into required "to nurse, practice dinner, chop in the fields, chop timber, carry water, wash, iron and ordinarily do basically each thing." She replaced into six years old on the time. as well the multitudinous chores, the lone salve replaced into shrink off from the community that replaced into the single tremendous source of convenience and help in a international the position she replaced into called some thing decrease than human by ability of the whites. Katie Phoenix, who replaced into offered as a touch lady to a solitary lady who had no different slaves, suggested she had no idea she replaced right into a baby until eventually her mistress's granddaughter got here for a visit. "i idea i replaced into basically littler, yet as old as grown-ups. i did not know human beings had grown up from little ones." she suggested. '

2016-12-02 06:33:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

It increased awareness of the value of life, love, and the need for solidarity.

2007-03-19 21:40:28 · answer #3 · answered by punk bitch piece of shit 3 · 0 0

I bet your history textbook will tell you. Try reading it.

2007-03-20 03:41:37 · answer #4 · answered by Bob Mc 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers