I think he pushes full force a head because hes trying to save face.
2007-03-19 14:52:40 · 20 answers · asked by sugarpie 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The president is not only wrong, but he is such an idiot that he shouldn't even be allowed to control the military.
He went there to solve his daddy's unfinished job.
Worse, he used 9/11 as a pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and create even MORE victims.
All you republicans that think the war is good, this is the message for you:
Go get dead in Iraq you idiots.
.
2007-03-19 15:07:51 · answer #1 · answered by gabriell_021 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think the "surge" is a mistake. I think the president came into office with an agenda to finish the job his father started, and get the guy that tried to kill his father. I think we need to set a specific timeline for the Iraqi government to step up and take care of business, with a draw down of troop strength comensurate with that ime table. i think that if we don't do this, we'll be there for the next 10-15 years, and nothing will change in that country.
2007-03-19 22:16:42 · answer #2 · answered by Charlie S 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
This is not the first question on the same issue.
Look the USA Constitution gave a wide power to President which can veto the majority voice.
So the President's move is unsupported by the majority of USA people.
Is this called best Democracy?
2007-03-19 22:03:16 · answer #3 · answered by 911 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes We need to make up plan to win the peace to leave the locals better than we found them, but the liberals aren't thinking either by say just leave. Is the world a better place with the US being a paper tiger?
2007-03-20 10:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush doesn't care about polls, and he doesn't care about saving face. He's trying to save the middle east.
A US surrender is an option only supported by leftists and the terrorists, and by states that sponsor terrorism and fascism. Better believe that 24 hours after the Democrats in Congress force a surrender, the Persian Empire will be born and we'll all be riding our bicycles in search of food six months later.
2007-03-19 22:01:59 · answer #5 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
NOTHING IS WRONG WITH IT AND HEXX NO WE SHOULDNT PULL OUT...what bush is doing is trying to save this country is more like it...as a survivor of 911 im disgusted by the overt cowardice of cut and run and how liberals just cant seem to understand retreat emboldens an enemy....given the present political climate, god help us all if you extremists dont wake up soon.
2007-03-19 22:13:06 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
It was wrong to begin with so yes, but what else is there for him to do he has another choice, however that choice will be more detrimental than the first. After four years we r still fighting a ground war? What the
2007-03-19 22:21:21 · answer #7 · answered by DFatOne 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He is not wrong, he is doing now what he did not do at first. Our President understands on an innate level how very important our mission is in Iraq, and Afganistan. If you think he doesn't know exaclty what he is doing then, all I can say is "Don't believe the Hype". Better we fight them over there, then in Boston,Ma. etc.
2007-03-19 22:00:01 · answer #8 · answered by Jerry_S. 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
We should send enough troops to get the job done.
No we should not pull out at this point.
2007-03-19 22:00:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, I think he is wrong, he has been wrong since the very beginning, when he lied to take us to war, however in order to keep the middle east in turmoil so as to keep oil profits high he will forge on for the rest of his term.
2007-03-19 21:59:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋