9/11 Truth sidenote: Rosie O'Donnel goes public on 9/11?

Question

After going public this week with her skepticism over the official story of 9/11, Rosie O'Donnell has continued to address the issue in a Q&A with her readers on her website.

We reported yesterday that O'Donnell, who has for weeks now been tentatively trying to raise the issue of 9/11 truth on her ABC show The View, wrote a blog entry encouraging her readers to research 9/11, in particular the building 7 demolition.

O'Donnell wrote :

• The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
• Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
• Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.
• The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
• Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

She then goes on to explain her thoughts on these facts.

Now, in follow up postings, O'Donnell has been answering reader questions regarding 9/11.

A section of the Q& A from her website http://www.rosie.com/ follows:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Thousands of special reports, videos, MP3's, interviews, conferences, speeches, events, documentary films, books and more - all for just 15 cents a day! Click here to subscribe! Find out the true story behind government sponsored terror, 7/7, Gladio and 9/11, get Terror Storm!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Teri writes: Do you believe in many conspiracy theroy’s?
Do you think if you were not a celeb you would still suffer from depression?
Please don’t take offence to my ?’s they are ment well.

rosie: i believe there is more to 9 11 than we have been told
depression runs in my family - so yes

vicki writes: Have you seen BBC vid of reporter telling of collapse of bldg 7 with bldg 7 still in background and 20 minutes before it collapsed? Weird to the max. So much we don’t know. Truth will out. Peace.
rosie: i have
the plot thickens

Leslie writes: Bush’s reaction to attack on 9/11 should b compulsary viewing. He didn’t move a muscle, didn’t look at who gave him the news but it’s his expression that’s so alarming & it wasn’t shock

rosie: shock was the look on everyone elses face
that morning
not his

i agree

stacey writes: OMG!! Where have I been?? What is this third tower that fell?? Where can I read more information on this tower? Sharing your opinion on the veiw has opened my eyes to so much plz. reply!!!!!

rosie: building 7
there is a link on my home page

Jada writes: Do you believe the U.S. government is spying illegally on its own citizen and using invasive and convert tactics to silence dissent?

rosie: i do

Noelle writes: the towers,Bush was not behind that, are you kidding me?He isnt a good enough actor to pull that off. Remember his reaction at the school when it was whispered to him.real emotion. i check it out, tho

rosie: real emotion?
r u kidding me
he didnt move a muscle
after hearing we were under attack
HE DID NOT MOVE

Deb writes: 911weknow.com: If I trust this info, I must believe that my govt has murdered its own people 4 $ in the name of God. I literally vomitted! Why isn’t this info aggressively investigated? Hell on earth.

rosie: info is out there

This shows the worth of public figures such as Rosie O'Donnell talking about 9/11. Whether you like her or not, clearly her readers and viewers are relatively uninitiated as far as 9/11 truth is concerned. One even comments that she never knew a third building had collapsed that day, therefore she is introducing new people to these facts.

Despite the customary ignorant name calling bloggers, the overall reaction to Rosie O'Donnell's stance has been positive. Some of the comments our article alone has recieved are as follows:

* never thought I would say it, but - "Go, Rosie."
* Its amazing, that rosie went public. More people are waking up, and hopefully more celebs will go public
* I gotta say I have a lot of respect for this woman now.
* Thank you Rosie! Please keep it up as this is the one issue that can blow this government wide open! You are a true American hero Rosie. It takes courage and you have it.

Rosie O'Donnell follows in the footsteps of other notable cultural figures who have spoken out on 9/11, such as David Lynch, James Brolin, Richard Linklater, Jesse Ventura, Matthew Bellemy, Ed Asner and Charlie Sheen.

Sheen, who went public with his views almost exactly a year ago now, was the first high profile celebrity to put his reputation on the line in the name of 9/11 truth and his courage should be saluted in opening the door for present and future individuals to follow his example.

Speaking exclusively to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network at the time, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events, stating "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

Sheen then went on to appear at a specially organised 9/11 truth conference in LA which 1200 people attended.

Following on from Sheen more recently, actor James Brolin appeared as a guest on Rosie O'Donnell's The View and urged the audience to check out the website 911weknow.com, which is a website that purports to expose how the twin towers and Building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, were brought down via controlled demolition.

Around the same time it emerged that film director and cult icon David Lynch had also made public his doubts about the official story behind 9/11. Lynch told Dutch television he thought WTC Building 7 was brought down via controlled demolition and that the Pentagon and Pennsylvania crash sites were suspicious due to the absence of evidence that a plane crashed at either location.

As we have noted before, it is important to stress that celebrity sound bites do not make a revolution, but it is important to remember that figures such as O'Donnell have an avenue to reach a lot of people. It is down to the discretion of her viewers to decide whether to look into what she is saying.

Should they do that they will discover that over the past few years, scores of highly regarded individuals have also gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

the article is located here:



http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2007/170307Rosie.htm


.

.

MY QUESTION:
Will this help in 9/11's re-investigation?


.

So, an argument with donald trump gets news coverage, but this doesn't????

clearly, the news media has chosen blackout over discretization.

i agree with you, burningbush!

.

MY POINT WAS ABOUT THE LACK OF MEDIA COVERAGE TO THIS. RUSH LIMBAUGH WAS THE ONLY ONE TO COVER IT (outside of the truth movement)

.

hey john, i am a fan.

you know what, i am going to laugh when you realize that the elite scum are playing you so that you will allow them to take over the world and build a world government that is NOT a democracy, oh and AK, these are the same people who are trying to make GUNS illegal.

you can make all the alien and tin foil jokes, but why would you oppose a re-investigation if you are so sure they didn't do it?

Answer 1

Send letters to the media and ask them why they are not paying any attention to all the people that want a real investigation of 9/11. I am shocked that barely any investigation was not done in front of the media. We are not able to have our freedom of speech validated here if the media doesn't investigate and tell us what is happening.

http://www.knowledgedrivenrevolution.com/Articles/200611/20061110_911_Truth_Dying.htm

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/february2007/270207bbcresponds.htm

http://911review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/fetzerexpandedx.htm

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/HaveWeBeenLiedTo.html

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20051205150219651

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/571-page-lie.htm

http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192

http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Fetzer_9Feb2006.html

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11222.htm

Answer 2

Actually comments surrounding wtc7 are taken out of context. Plus, demolition theory is highly circumstantial and concrete evidences are also disputed by many. So we're dealing with something that depend on interpretation of data. Which makes this 9/11 inside job very weak. Especially when facts and expert testimony alike are dismissed simply as 'cover ups', 'lies'...etc. Like the initial NIST reports mention just fires at wtc7, but full report later detailed major structural damages.

If one should do research on 9/11 then why not do research on 9/11 inside job and those who dispute it? So all those 'experts' who never had direct involvement in 9/11 investigation other than watching TV clips are more reliable source?

I find it amusing people claim 9/11 is used as Iraq War execuse, but all the hijackers are from Saudi and not from Iraq and no one ever made solid connection between Saddam and Osama. Why not create fake Iraqi hijackers? Because that would have save lot of time and energy making stupid WMD case which no one really bought. UN wasn't even convinced, so they didn't give ok to Iraq. So, they're willing to stage event that take out 3000 US citizen, but can't create convincing WMD evidence? Which ton of insider later came out to criticize.

There were numerous leaks regarding WMD intel fabrication, but for some reason no one made any leaks about secret plan that took out 3000 of US citizen. That's tooo good to be true.

This is clearly the case of more information is not always better.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

Answer 3

Always insults not issues go read what NIST, FEMA and 911 Commision Report say about WTC 7: nada nothing zero zilch. It's like was never even there?!?

Answer 4

What a bunch of whack jobs!

Rosie is a Christiophobic, a Hetrosexualphobic, a Sexist slimy worm filth.

Is is a wonder that Rosie is a fuzzbumper? Who would want to put anything into her (other than a .44 Magnum, I mean)? No REAL man would stick his member into that stank hole! Yikes!

Just looking at her face is good birthcontrol! I would rather give up sex that have it with her! Sex ALONE would be more fulfilling! Rosie is a butch dyke only becasue no man wants anything to do with her skanky ***!

She is a slit! A Gash! A Ho!

She is an easy and very LARGE target. She is falling off the map to the point that the only people who will watch her are lezbos, drug addicts, terrorists and other freaks and societal cast offs!

I bet Rose has a few tats and has her clitoris pierced! GROSS!!!!!!!!!! Big Hairy Gash!

Answer 5

I have to say Rosie opened my eyes about 9/11. Because of her voice I have gone to different web sites to check out what else is out there about it. Has it changed my mind about 9/11, I don't know yet...I am still researching, but it has caused me to ask questions.

As for the comments being made about her on here, she is not spewing junk, there is a website linked to her blog that she has nothing to do with...she is expressing her opinion and if that opens peoples eyes, then all the better.

It amazes me that no matter when you mention her name people have rude comments on here...yes, she does offer her opinion, but does that necessitate calling her rude and obnoxious names. Doesn't free speech apply to everyone?

Answer 6

Try bubble wrap.It works better than tin foil.But what about the U.F.O's alien conspiracy!? I looked it up online it must be true!!?Nut jobs like you must be laughed at!!
HA-HA-HA(hurting my sides )
Also has anybody died than contests 9/11? Like Vince Forester??(Knew about Clinton's scams) Also do you deny the Holocaust...?
Do you also carry a Communist card too!!!
Loser!!!!Will you bow to the Islamo Fascists?
Also who was really behind Oklahoma City,I've read that Clinton did to start his war against the (Christians) right wing.
What about his spying on ALL AMERICAN'S by omnivore or the meggido project ,you can look that up!!!

Answer 7

Rosie O'Donnell is not a demolition expert, physics expert or possessed of any other credentials that would make her opinion worth considering listening to

all the "holes" in the official story have been bored by kooks, and I will laugh when you all realize when you're wrong

Answer 8

She's crazy and you repeat her words? are you nuts? Whats next bush had something to do with Kennedy's assassination?

Answer 9

What makes Rosie any more informed than anyone else? She's a nut bar.

Answer 10

Stop being a nut bar... Just because Rosie's as crazy as you does that mean you have to be a fat lesbian too? Ahhh, the fat lesbian conspiracy is all coming together!