English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is nothing that can proof Al-Qaeda did 9/11 and there are a lot of things that can proof USA did 9/11.

2007-03-19 13:41:36 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

14 answers

You have been paying too much attention to the state-run news in your country. There is plenty of evidence as to who committed the terrorist attack on 9/11 and it was not the American government.

2007-03-19 13:52:13 · answer #1 · answered by ©2009 7 · 2 4

Your question, and the answers received, don't have a purpose or point to make.

The facts are still unintelligible to make any solid conclusions.

This question I feel will be brought forward for a long time...as long as Yahoo Answers stays active.

The reflex answers will still only go so far, and never beyond...to say that we don't live in a box and have tunnel vision...because we all fall prey to that.

I'll show you some flaws in the question...

USA is a big power with high debt in a world now globalized with capitalism now seeming to have more control.

Al Qaeda is a word introduced to USA by Prez. Bush, not having won the popular vote in year 2000. Prior to that, images of a long bearded man walking on hills was being fed through media. Who is he? Who are they? Can we say with CERTAINTY if this is anything we can point a finger to or prove exists? Hah? Can we?

Can we rush to judgement when we haven't enough evidence nor facts?

Media says Bill Gates is richest man in the world. My calculations say that someone else might be. Lump together the four descendants of Sam Walton, and together they have more assets than Bill Gates. Facts, my friend!

Yet, it's generally acceptable to say that Bill Gates is the richest person in the world. Period. End of comment. Don't investigate. Don't go beyond your box, you might not like what you turn up.

Instead of questioning, why not dig for facts like I did.

We are now fully globalized, the internet helped it along, and knowing as much, it is extremely difficult to pin anything that happened on 911 on either USA or "Al Qaeda".

Expand your horizons.

2007-03-19 20:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Obama is so fed on with political correctness that he won't make a stand against any team be attentive to matter how criminal they're. Of he has no character to speak of as a frontrunner. He speaks nicely yet he will become a rock while asked a puzzling question. additionally he's an equivalent threat retard till somebody opinions him because of the fact of this the Obama boys created attack WaTCH to be a great brother Gestapo investigator team to checklist and supply up undesirable propaganda from entering into mainstream media while immediately in elementary terms sturdy propaganda is needed. David

2016-10-19 03:07:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In the grand world of schemes, documents show and prove our govt. is behind terror attacks upon our own people and those inflicted upon other countries.

1. The first WTC bombing in '93. It was in the NY Post about how the person responsible was a 43yr old ex-military man from Iraq(doing this off memory), he was given $1million to build a bomb and park the truck containing it right next to the basement pillars which would've weakened the structure enough for a collapse(not like the controlled demolitions of the second attacks, this would've taken out neighboring buildings in the process and probably would've killed a lot more people than in 9/11). The footage from the first WTC bombing was quickly pulled after a couple of times being air'd on tv.

2. OPERATION: NORTHWOODS. In 1962, LL Limmitzer(not correct spelling) Head Cheif of Staff at the time devised a plan to help the US go into Cuba and therefore get into a war with Russia. The plan consisted of hijacking airliners by REMOTE CONTROL and crash them into buildings, various sites and even sinking one of our own ships and blaming them on Cuba. It made it all the way to the Secretary of Defense, before it was declined. You can google it, it has been declassified for your viewing pleasure.

3. OKC bombing. Why is it they talk about the pillars being blown out when a vehicle was parked up against it(which by the way left just a tiny crater in conjunction with end result of the buildings damage), and the fact the one of the pillars not in the inital range of the explosion damaged? Simple, there were reports of MULTIPLE explosions felt. Just look at the seismic reports that day. If the building's structure was blown out, that my friend would imply that the explosive device was in the building. The other fact of the Bomb Squad removing 2 larger explosive devices within the building during that day. Of course later reports told us that only 1 truck bomb did all that damage. Why is it that there were 12 security cameras in the area pointing the direction of the building and only 1 was used to show Timothy McVeigh leaving the truck minutes before the tragedy. Eye witness accounts said that there were multiple men running away from the area in jogging suits right before the blast. FBI arrested a couple hundred men pertaining to the description brought foward, but were told to be released by non other than President Clinton. Putting all the info together has inside job written all over it. You can't deny this stuff. WAKE UP!!!!

3. I almost hate mentioning this event for the hundreth time but 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB!! Silverstein saying "pull it." He tried defending that by pertaining to the firefighters, but all rescue relief was told to exit the building around 11am that day. Also the Firefighters and Police telling everyone to get back that the building was coming down. The fact that an uneven fire could topple the 47story steel framed building in 6.5sec in its own footprint, when the building was reinforced back in '89. The building had most deptartments of the govt. in there. Including Guiliani's own safety bunker that was designed to resist heat thousands of degrees for days. The fact that there was molten steel underneath the rubble found weeks later and that when the building initially goes down, you see the crimp in the middle along with the windows blowing out as it falls vertically down at freefall speed to the ground.

For buildings 1 & 2, they talk about how temps would've reached temps high enough to weaken steel. This could've been true, but the point is even that standing, steel can still support 2 to 3 times its weight. They then conclude about how a fire ball raced down the elevator shaft to the basement. That's a BIG F-IN LIE!!! The building was built like 3 multi story buildings stacked on each other. No elevator shaft carreied passengers all the way to the top. There were 9 shafts, each only going a maximum of a 1/3 up the building. Then you'd have to take another one to the next third of the building. Also, even if the pancake theory is proven in this which I can personally see it not, because there's no resistance from one floor to the next. This would've caused a gradual slowing of the collapse, this one increased in speed. Also, along with the pancake theory collapse, then why the hell aren't any of the 47 4in thick steel pillars which made up the main structure for the building standing. Easy, look at some of the pics and video footage before and after the collapse. In one aerial shot, you'll see molten steel falling from one of the buildings with white smoke accompanying it. This along with the samples that Professor Steven E. Jones of BYU has concluded being the accelerated version of Thermite known as thermate. This stuff can be easily purchased and will cut steel like a hot knife through butter. The fact, in some of the aftermath pics, you see the pillars cut a diagonal implicating the use of shape-charges which would've caused the buildings to fall in their own footprint.

Our govt. uses techniques of fear and intimidation to control the masses and use once friends to the GOVT. aka Bin Laden and Hussein and make them our sworn enemies. Our own govt. will not allow us to see the plane hitting the Pentagon raises even more questions. They're hiding everything from us, and telling us that everything's alright. TOTAL COMPLETE BULL. I for one, am sick of it and not tolerating it anymore!!!!

2007-03-21 11:28:59 · answer #4 · answered by Ted S 4 · 1 0

"there are a lot of things that can proof USA did 9/11"

When will the tin foil brigade move on like the rest of the thinking adults?

2007-03-19 13:52:26 · answer #5 · answered by hillbilly_jihad 1 · 2 4

Al Qaeda did it with lots of aid from bill clinton and his gang.

2007-03-19 15:18:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Its just like how the collapses are more easily explained by demolitions rather than jet fuel. Sometimes the answer is right in front of your eyes, yet you do not see it. People just don't want to think that their gov't. is capable of such an atrocity. History shows us that many gov'ts have killed their own people, but since this is America, it simply can't happen here. Where is the logic in that? Is it time to finally wake up?

2007-03-19 13:53:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

The first WTC bombing was an inside job.

The Oklahoma City Bombing was an inside job.

USS Cole was an inside job.

And, guess what?

9/11 was an inide job too.

2007-03-19 14:53:06 · answer #8 · answered by Christian Paragon 3 · 2 3

It's possible that the two jets crashing into the WTC might constitute as proof.

Jets piloted by Saudi terrorists trained in Afghanistan under Osama Bin Laden.

Please don't be stupid anymore.

2007-03-19 13:59:15 · answer #9 · answered by kensai 2 · 2 4

USA of course.

2007-03-20 01:30:10 · answer #10 · answered by aminu2763 3 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers