No, of course they won't pull out.
Democrats don't want to leave Iraq. They just say they do just to get votes and to keep anti-war people happy.
Powerful liberal Senator Feinstein's company got a $600 million military contract. Do you think she wants to leave?
"In February, the firm won an army engineering and logistics contract that could bring in $3.1 billion during the next eight years. "http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/04/22/MN310531.DTL
2007-03-19 13:37:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by a bush family member 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
That is there main campaign platform so of course they will.
While I ma not going to say we should not have gone to war with Iraq. We did not have an after war occupation plan and have no realistic goals.
really does it matter at this point if when we leave. We cannot own up to reality so we will never have a realistic goal for Iraq so why waist money and troops on fantasies.
Still the decorates have no one with there hat in the ring that i would vote for. Pulling out of Iraq is about the only thing I agree with them on but i don't agree with them on why we should do it or that we where wrong to go in.
Basically we have just messed it up beyond repair and fixing the situation would be more trouble then it is worth.
2007-03-19 20:29:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by thatoneguy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Democrats cannot immediately get us out of Iraq. It would take more time than they are willing to admit to. They are leading people down a false road and their promise cannot be fulfilled. they are just telling people what they will do, knowing that it would be impossible. They tell you what you want to hear so that they can get more votes. It's really a hypocritical way to do things but that is exactly how it is done. Even if by chance they were to get us out of Iraq before all is accomplished, it would be disastrous for the United States. Ohhhh, how unwise the liberals are.
2007-03-19 13:47:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by freedomrings 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Apparently not...at least if Hillary wins the White House.
I read an article earlier today which indicated that, in an interview with a reporter from the New York Times, she stated that she did not believe the U.S. should pull out of Iraq in 2008.
2007-03-19 13:40:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
liberalism in the end forces its adherents to become hypocrites. They adopt one pose in public, but when it comes to what matters most in their own lives-their property, their bank accounts, their conspiracy, their privacy, and their children-they get jettison in their liberal principles : if these ideas don’t work for the Liberal individuals who promise them , how can they work for the rest of us? Democrats voted for the war, now some, especially Hillary is in denial, she lied about the vote, in her twisting the facts around, used it to bash the war and troops. Democrats have already abandon not only the US, The Troops and the people in Iraq now. They have abandon their own party by not keeping the promises they made to get into Congress. Nothing unusual about this, they never keep a promise, after they get what they want.
2007-03-19 13:59:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the Democrats will pull out of Iraq. Of course, it won't happen over night like you are alluding to in your question. It will be a staggered withdrawal with probably 50% being redeployed in the first 6 months. The rest will be redeployed in small groups over the next year or two. There will still be a few that will be permanently there due to the Iranian crisis, unless Baghdad becomes another Saigon and a full troop withdrawal is needed.
2007-03-19 13:40:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You lie to your self along with your concept procedure and in precise assistance. a million. a twin of the Democrats opt to come back at the same time so will the Republicans. From what I definitely have considered the Republican social gathering is a lot more advantageous united than the Democrats. All McCain needs now's a sturdy Republican conservative as his vp selection and the social gathering will call him a genius. 2. i imagine this may develop into my sought after quote " thank God we do not favor each vote to win. A vote for a third social gathering Republican is a vote for Obama, it in simple terms makes honestly no experience to do. Plus in case you experience your candidate is a sturdy in good structure for president or vp, you want to get her or him to seem formerly election time. Bob Barr and Ron Paul opt to become in touch in the primaries and earn their spot as a candidate. It makes no experience to play spoiler in simple terms to get money from the Democratic area. 3.commonly used Conservatives in simple terms favor him to get a conservative operating mate and they are on board. McCain fairly has a sweet set up, his inventory is transforming into even as Obama's is falling. 4. the country has a low approval score on Bush so that they say. yet, I definitely have not voted on any degree and that i do no longer be conscious of what number of people the surveys encompass. i'm a Democrat who has grown drained of Obama's lies and absence of a real plan, i'm balloting McCain. 5. more advantageous individuals view McCain because the most honest candidate.
2016-11-26 23:31:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Promises were made by Bush,and he calls himself a liar everyday. His job is making money for his friends and doesnot give a damn about the people of USA nevermind Iraq! So what job is he supposed to get done, his lies about bringing deomocracy have turned into Civil War with death, destruction and hopelessness!. Let's hope the demcratic congress succeeds with plans to pull out of Irag before 2008!
2007-03-19 14:13:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by razor 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Leaving Iraq anytime in the near future is the dumbest idea ever. The political state they are in is in shambles. And they really have no military to defend their own country with. Half to three quarters of the Iraqi police force is corrupt.
Keep in mind everyone says this or that til they get to the White house. Once, they are in office and find out the true state of affairs for the country and foreign policy. They tend to sway from what got them elected in the first place. While they are running for office. They are not entitled to all our military knowledge. Hence, the we are going to do this and that then come to find out once in office they can't. This is a common tradition in politics and is really a double edged sword for both parties. Look at it this way would you want to be the person to withdraw all our troops just to have the next President have to return our soldiers to clean up a mess you where to scared to do?
2007-03-19 13:52:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by L3THAL_INJ3CTION 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The democrats will self destruct before the election.They have nothing to offer other than defeat.They will not win in 2008.Should circumstances change and they win-then we will have hell on earth for the next 4 years.They will almost destroy the country.In 2012,the Republicans will win to clean up the democratic mess and bring the USA back to life.Hopefully we will not be speaking arabic.
2007-03-19 13:46:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by dumbuster 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
They haven't done it yet and will not unless they control the House, Senate and Presidency. Remember, no matter how big the Liberals claim the victory in '06 was it is 53%/47% in the House and 48%/48%/2%(Independent) in the Senate. Thats not exactly an overwhelming mandate folks and that why they have only presented a non-binding resolution to date.
2007-03-19 13:41:48
·
answer #11
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
2⤊
0⤋