If HISTORY is written by the winners, does it means that it has no significance??

Answer 1

History is basically an opinion. You see it different then me. Now, of course, not all history is opinion, like dates and wars and inventions and things like that. We see Hitler as an evil man, but to a many Germans in the 1930's to 1940's, he was the savior of their country. It just means that history is the basics. You don't have to hear why it happened or who was good and who was bad, just know that it happened. It is important, very important.

Answer 2

No, it has tons of significance. The statement is designed to make you remember that history is not set in stone, but evolves and changes over time as new facts come to light.

Answer 3

Victors write the histories. the better-aspect histories are transforming into more advantageous powerful at providing finished coverage of activities and classes, yet on the familiar and secondary aspect it really is omitted. between the best books I ever examine replaced into "Lies my instructor instructed Me", I advise you %. up a duplicate. also - colonialism and imperialism is roofed fairly drastically in maximum HS AP instructions. Genocide is roofed fairly thoroughly in maximum secondary faculties, in spite of if there is no longer a lot concentration on the Armenian Genocide, Pol Pot, or Rwanda.

Answer 4

no, it just means we must be more critical and analytical of what is written, and make the effort to seek out other points of view. this is what's call "history from below" or subaltern studies. off-shoots are ethnic studies, women's studies, etc. which give more diverse points of view of history.

Answer 5

No. It does mean that even in dealing with primary sources, we have to carefully evaluate the biases of the writer.