ok i have noticed that my aunts (not uncles) but my aunts decide that by the time their daughters can move in with their boyfriends when they turn 16 17..i have noticed they let them cause they have been with them for more than 2 months then they let them move in but thats only if they are together for at least 2 months or more ..but how many of you parents would let ur daughter move in w/ a boyfriend at 16 or 17..btw parents dont have to answer this..im doing a poll to show that my 13 aunts r wrong for it cause my cousins can get pregant if they have sex too...
2007-03-19 12:52:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Pregnancy & Parenting ➔ Pregnancy
Ok first of all there is no way I would let my daughter move in with her boyfriend at the age of 16-17 she is still a minor and I could go to jail, but that is not the reason.. To know that your daughter is having sex at such a young age and knowing the risk she is taking of becoming pregnant is just not very good parenting sorry to say.. My dad and mom was very hesitant about letting me marry at the age of 18. Although we dated for a couple of years it was still not long enough... Now I wish I had listened to them. I am divorced and remarried to the right guy this time.. Your aunts are crazy for letting a child live with a boyfriend, and allowing so after only a couple of months of dating is even crazier...
2007-03-19 17:30:28 · answer #1 · answered by auntietawnie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm only 13 and i know that if i would go to a guys house i would want to well have sex with the guy it dont matter how mature i can be at 16 or 17 isn't their something else the can be doing other than having a long term boyfriend? and start living with him school maybe
2007-03-19 16:37:42 · answer #2 · answered by destineeschild93 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly, your aunts are not wrong. they might as well let their kids move out and move in with whomever they choose. if they fight it, it will only end in your aunts getting their heart broken.
at age 16 you can legally move out of your parents house and there is nothing the parent can do. they cant even report the child as a runaway.
2007-03-19 13:09:28 · answer #3 · answered by Sunshine 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY!!! There is nothing that would convince me to let my daughter live with a 16-17 y.r. old boy. NOTHING! It is wrong on so moany levals. I also would not allow any girl to move in with my son.
2007-03-19 12:58:27 · answer #4 · answered by beth_n_danny 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK seriously, its fine. i was 15 when i got with my bf, and I'm 17 now and pregnant and STILL with the same guy. I'm moving out of my moms house, and me and him are buying our own place. i think weather or not they can move in with their bf's should depend on how mature as a person they are.
2007-03-19 13:08:20 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
16 is below the age of consent. They should be in school, and at home, not living with boyfriends and playing house
2007-03-19 13:28:59 · answer #6 · answered by jimbell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, i dont think its wrong either! when i was 16 my boyfriend was living with me! and their were no issues, i still finished school, got a job... all the wonerful stuff!! we payed rent!
I think it depends on the responsibility level, and maturity level of the child!
2007-03-19 13:31:59 · answer #7 · answered by Amanda 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think 16 and 17 is too young, at 18 childern become adults and make thier own decision.
2007-03-19 13:00:49 · answer #8 · answered by JOHN P W 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No I wouldn't, once she turns 18 then its her decision, not any earlier. My daughter is only 4 so I have a ways to go.
2007-03-19 13:02:59 · answer #9 · answered by Katie Girl 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
My mom questioned whether I should have my boyfriend move in with me when I was 24. What the hell is going on with parents today? Seriously, I would call child protective services. That is not right. Please tell me these girls are on birthcontrol.
2007-03-19 12:56:33 · answer #10 · answered by Jamie B 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋