Surely if our government wants us to believe that those mammoth engines were vaporized by a limited supply of jet-fuel, they'd release the scores of surveillance films? For instance, the Sheraton Hotel, which was just across the highway, had a camera on its roof. This camera would have had a perfect, wide-angle view of the attack on the Pentagon? So why don't they just put all of this conspiracy mumbo-jumbo to rest and release the film? They say it's for National Security purposes, although I don't see how.
I conclude that a 767 didn't hit the Pentagon. I believe a plane of some sort did strike the Pentagon, but it wasn't a 767. This means that our government is lying.
2007-03-19
12:44:58
·
10 answers
·
asked by
jimmyb20032003
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
I've seen the footage of the F-14 hitting the concrete wall, as well. If I remember, they were testing to see if it could penetrate the roof of a nuclear power-plant. I believe the reinforced concrete was ridiculously thick.
The Popular Mechanics article admits that the tail section and body parts were found. Those are considerably weaker than the 2 massive engines. So, the engines were utterly disintegrated and vaporized, and the tail section wasn't? The body-parts and crew uniforms weren't? Although it's true that the plane wouldn't cause a cartoon cut-out as it hit the building, the engines would! The engines would have kept right on going in the same direction that they were. The engines are mounted under the wings, a significant distance from the fueselage. So where is there any indication that the engines struck the building?
2007-03-19
12:59:03 ·
update #1
There were many witnesses who discribed a plane around the size of a corporate lyre-jet. There were many witnesses who saw an airliner. When something is flying at those incredible speeds, the common person may having difficulty recognizing what they saw in that split second. Granted, this fact could support either side of the argument.
2007-03-19
13:01:28 ·
update #2
Easily done....I have seen footage of and F-14 Tomcat plow into a cement wall at flight speed and there was literally nothing left no bigger than you hand! Conspiracy theories fit you!
2007-03-19 12:49:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
You are right, but the plane was a 100 ton 757-200 which weighs 100 tons and is 1/2 football field long! The FBI confiscated all the film, and in 5 years has not released one single picture of that plane.
half a football field with 2 Rolls Royce engines flying near the Pentagon would be a fairly easy thing to see! It was much lower than the ones which hit the trade centers, but we have tons of those photo's and videos!
2007-03-19 12:56:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It isnt possible..........easy.I hand load my own bullets for my rifles and such.I fashioned a titanium bullet and in a controlled environmment I fired from a .270 winchester with a 1200 feet per second velocity.Guess what...titanium doesnt vapotize at that speed.@818 miles per hour hitting concrete with a 2500 MPA RATING
And lets get this straight.Lets assume that the palne did vaporize.Well then how did it carry on thru the other rings in this vapourized condition?You cant have it both ways.Either it vapourized and "was almost in aliquid state "as popular mechanics claims or it wasnt and it pierced all that concrete which leaves us the question of where the hell is it,the engines the seats etc
I am familiar with the f4 crash test.I did some research and guess what ........the engine didnt vapourize
Sure we have eyewitnesses who say they saw a plane,but by the same token we have eyewitnesses who say they saw something very different.So obviously we have to discount eyewitness testimony in this case as unreliable.Last week the 4 of us in a truck driving down a highway.An animal runs in front of us.I said it was a domestic cat,my brother saw a fox and my FRIEND SAW something but hedoesnt know what.So who is right.That leaves us with the facts.
The large piece of plane fuselage isnt a match with any known airplane ,model or airline .This has been done many times by many parties including air crash reconstruction experts
I have talked to many pilots who are familair with the case and they agree that the maneuver described would be darn near impossible to execute in that aircraft and difficult in any aircraft
I believe it when the govt says they cant release all the film because of nationla security,oh yeah.There would be rioting in the streets and the whitehouse would be burned to the freakin ground if they did
And tell me ,who are these folks in office clothes walking around picking up pieces of something IMMEDIATELY after the crash.Sunglasses,shortsleeves,loafers etc.Hardly the dress of rescuers,forensics,DOT or anyone else.No coveralls,safety boots ,gloves,cameras etc.WHO THE HECK WERE THESE GUYS!! Is that what you usually see after plane crashes in urban areas?Guys dressed in office attire in dark glasess picking up scrap metal?
Even the Shanksville crash.Where the heck is the plane.There is a gash in the ground with some small pieces of metal but where is the freakin plane?I have looked at dozens of aircrashes now and not one of them looks even remotely like that.There is always pieces strewn all over the place,baggage,meals from the galley,paper from the magazines,bodies large burned areas,glass from windows,fuselage sections,tail sections engine sections.Even the shuttle when it went poof ,they were finding stuff all over the place
2007-03-19 12:53:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Paul I 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
the only that i like is, you will possibly want a soccer field crammed with human beings to execute a plan like that yet 19 adult males and approximately 5 greater from a cave accomplished it with perfection. i understand government is undesirable yet 24 human beings can execute a undertaking greater effective that a 30,000 seats soccer field crammed with government workers... we are in problem.
2016-12-18 18:11:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
SO you are saying that the many, many people that witnessed the plane flying over the Expressway were mass hypnotized? And it was many on the day of the attack.
2007-03-19 12:50:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by meathookcook 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Another Are 51! Bushes administration is so full of human waste that they think we are all idiots.
2007-03-19 12:49:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by pelister56 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I guess it was aliens. We should send Clinton to Mars right away to negociate.
2007-03-19 12:48:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Daniel 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
More baseless conspiracy nonsense.
2007-03-19 12:50:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They were never there. they think we are idiots
2007-03-19 12:53:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by kerry9477 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It isn't possible.
Peace
2007-03-19 12:52:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by J S 1
·
1⤊
1⤋