Of course it isn't. Bible, US Constitution and even human conscience says its wrong.
2007-03-19 11:45:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by sadeyzluv 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Is it morally acceptable to torture a terrorist prisoner for information that could save the life of your mother, father, brother, sister, wife, husband, girlfriend, boyfriend, son, daughter? Every "innocent life" is loved by someone. What if it was your loved ones? Is it moral not to torture them?
2007-03-19 12:19:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Raul D 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it is never acceptable.
In addition to the immorality of the action, you cannot trust the information you receive as a result. People will eventually say anything to make the torture stop.
I point you to the recent "confessions" of that screwball Khalil Sheik Mohammad.... That man has confessed to everything except the crucifixtion and the assasination of JFK!!!
2007-03-19 12:29:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep - and the real joke is the fact Jack Bauer does it every week on 24 and we *love* it.
Don't tell me most Americans wouldn't have minded a broken finger or two if the World Trade Centers would still be standing today.
Torture works, plain and simple. We do it take save lives, the terrorists do it for political purposes - very different reasons.
-Dave
http://cycling.santantraders.com
2007-03-19 11:47:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dave S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
HECK YES IT IS.
Think about it, what they are calling torture on a terrorist now days to what they do to themselves.
We strip them, and put panties on their heads....they don't die, they don't suffer any physical pain, and the panties are able to be removed.
What do they do????
Cut off fingers, hands, legs, toes.....use electricity to see them shake and scream because of the physical pain in a wet shower, and when they are done, slice off the head and kill their "prisoner".
Which one is more Torture? When will the lib's get it, this IS WAR, not Mr. Roger's Neighbourhood.
2007-03-19 11:51:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by lorencehill 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
That all depends on your definition of torture. Threats and embarrassment , in my opinion, are not torture. Making someone think they will drown is not torture. Do you really think that torture would work on these fanatics that would gladly give their life just to kill an innocent baby and its mother?
2007-03-19 12:01:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by just the facts 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
at first, torture isn't clever. This has been shown lower back and lower back with the help of many study. additionally, too lots reliance on torture will make us much less vulnerable to favour greater clever varieties of counter-terrorism, at the same time with intelligence accumulating and analysing, and immediately police artwork. It additionally impacts negatively on the values that variety the very foundation of our society. each and every time we erode man or woman freedom, we lose the honour of others and our self-admire. i come across it needed to think of that i'm area of a community which holds the life and the actual integrity of any guy sacred, which respects its very own freedom. while my u . s . is linked with acts of that nature, at the same time with torture in Algeria or the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior -i'm French-, i've got faith ashamed, and much less vulnerable to hitch that society. And enable's settle for it, 10000 CCTV cameras, the death penalty and torture won't supply up any criminal or terrorist to act as he does.
2016-10-19 02:52:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
morally, maybe not... but we have to realize these terrorists are very well trained to resist admitting informations. id rather choose saving thousands of innocent lives than sparing pain to one person who's only goal in life is to hurt people.
2007-03-19 11:57:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that depends entirely on your morals. as far as some of the insurgents are concerned it is fine. as for me and my christian morals, it is wrong to torture
2007-03-19 11:47:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by ribuckeye 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Terrorism is not about morality, neither is the war against it. Apples and oranges.
2007-03-19 11:46:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. it violates the 8th amendment and makes us just as bad as terrorists.
and anything they say can be a lie. under torture people will say anything
2007-03-19 12:37:26
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋