which one of these instigating things can america do without..??? pork chops for mohamed refers to the checkers at target who all of a sudden decided they couldnt touch pork because of their religion....ive had enough of all these kinds of instigating radicals...from the left, to the right...what should america do about it..??? i say it is hate speech or action and should be a jailable offense....and you say...?????
2007-03-19 11:29:28 · 5 answers · asked by badjanssen 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
SLIMFAST FOR BUDDAH
2007-03-19 11:35:24 · answer #1 · answered by Unfrozen Caveman 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, I don't think Jesus wants either one, first off he was Jewish and they're not known for enjoying fine pork products. Second, Jesus wouldn't smoke marijuana he'd eat it, just as his father directed in GEN 1:29.
One of the prices we pay for our many freedoms is tolerating other viewpoints, beliefs and actions that we may not agree with but are nothing the less within their right to express, believe or do. however, I do have to acknowledge that sometimes tolerance is not regarded as enough, occasionally we are forced to accept, even embrace things we find offensive all in the name of freedom.
2007-03-19 18:46:06 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They have a right to protest against having to touch pork on religious grounds. i'd bet you'd have no problem with Jews doing it.
And America needs more bong hits, it might calm you guys down a bit...
2007-03-19 18:32:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
what about a compromise..pork chops in a bong.
2007-03-19 18:33:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothing, it is freedom of speech.
2007-03-19 18:34:06 · answer #5 · answered by Angelus2007 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋