2007-03-19 11:22:46 · 9 answers · asked by landrewlion11 2 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
I am wondering how one can be arrogant and yet be quite. Arrogant seems to be an impression form of you by other people about you. How would they be able to form that impression w/o you opening your mouth. To this end, what is wrong with being quite and arrogant is the likelihood that one is not able to be both.
2007-03-19 12:22:28 · answer #1 · answered by dmfb1906 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing wrong with being quite people tend to be a late at talking to other people. But being a arrogant person is another thing people tend to say away from people like that becouse arrogant people don't have fun.
2007-03-19 18:33:47 · answer #2 · answered by sammy m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did you mean quiet? If so quiet is fine, I'm quiet, when I say something I mean it and I don't chatter on about nothing just for the sake of talking. Arrogant is not so good, don't confuse the two either, quiet people are usually shy not arrogant.
2007-03-20 06:27:05 · answer #3 · answered by Snake eyes 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
quites OK but i dont like arrogant i don't think many people do
2007-03-19 18:38:36 · answer #4 · answered by blueendred 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOTHING. quiet right? that just makes you an individual and not one that is part of the group. it isn't wrong unless you use it to put people down and hurt them.
2007-03-19 18:57:25 · answer #5 · answered by that_cool_chic 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
arrogant peole dont, look at their own flaws they look at everyone else and therefore people don,t like them
2007-03-19 19:02:33 · answer #6 · answered by denny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everything.
2007-03-19 18:33:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Un popular and failure in life.
2007-03-20 00:56:47 · answer #8 · answered by leowin1948 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
u look like an asshole.
2007-03-19 18:30:55 · answer #9 · answered by lg 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋