Why can Democrats call Bush dumb?

Question

If Bush is as dumb as they claim he is how did he do this:

How did he manage to rig the election as Democrats say, don't you have to be intelligent to do that.

How did he mastermind 911, you would have to be really smart to do that.

How did he get the UN, the whole world to pass resolutions to take out Saddam, wow you have to be pretty smart to do that.

How did he manage to get Hillary, Kerry, Edwards and all the other intelligent senators in the US Senate to pass a bill that gave Bush authorization to take out Saddam. Wow how did he manage to do that, after all he is dumb.

How did he manage to get two conservative supreme court justices confirmed, when the Democrats said over their dead body. Wow he is too dumb to be able to do that, but he did.

I am sure I will see the usual retarded rants about he lied, and this and that, but everyone with some common sense can tell it is just the usual Democrat blame the other guy.

The Democrats are dumb from the looks of it.

lltrix, for you information Einstein, I never called them liberals.

I SAID Democrats, I know there are conservative Democrats.

As usual you run your mouth without looking at what was said.

Answer 1

He just got lucky.

Answer 2

You're throwing a lot out there. Even though none of your questions end in question marks, I'll try to answer them.

Well, it really has nothing to do with Bush being dumb or him being able to "persuade" Hillary, Kerry, Edwards, or any Democrat senator.

Bush, Hillary, Kerry, Edwards, and many senators and representatives are a part of an upper class that aren't looking out for the interest of the American people. It's hard for your average Joe that wants to change things to run for government. He or she doesn't have the money of a Kerry, Bush, or a Clinton, so their efforts are often squashed.

What we really need is campaign finance reform to allow people a chance to run for government to make things better. Someone from the community will most likely want to listen to the community, not interests groups and lobbyists.

Be careful about the questions you pose. Are you insisting that Bush masterminded 9/11 and rigged the election? If you do, I hope you have the morality to dislike him. I'm sure if he did do those things, the forefathers of our country wouldn't be too happy with him being in office. However, I wouldn't assume and everyone who doesn't like Bush thinks he masterminded 9/11. I dislike W, but I don't think he made it happen; I just think he's doing an awful job handling the aftermath.

Answer 3

Bush is dumb as a door knob. No. he didn't do any of those things you mentioned- Dick Cheney did. Bush is just a dummy and a mouth piece for clever Cheney. Bush passed at the bottom of his class and even that because of his father. Everything (all business ventures) he has ever touched, they all turned to ****. Bush has absolutely no clue what he is saying in any of his speeches. He is the most incompetent of all the presidents. He is the first president who cannot complete an English sentence properly. He is nothing but a disgrace to America and humanity. He didn't even know where Iraq and Afghanistan were until a year after the wars started. Cheney is simply using Bush to do all the evil things so he and his crook buddies can benefit financially. Do you honestly believe that a retard like him could ever win the US presidency without his last name?

Answer 4

The 2000 election was crafted by his family and his campaign managers (i.e.:Katherine Harris). Sad to say, that year, the Dems didn't fight as hard to extend the recount as the Republicans did to stop it.

All the rest in that list were manufactured not by George W. Bush HIMSELF, but by his family and his campaign leaders.

Mind you the Republican party was the majority in both houses in congress. Even if all the Dems voted against whatever the Republicans were pushing, which they did, the Pres would do it anyway. Why? because the President, in general, has a lot of power.

I won't call him dumb, but I will call him a bad leader. He knows what his party is doing, but he doesn't want to look bad.

I won't call the democrats dumb either, but they could have campaigned harder for that recount.

But hey, better late than never.

Answer 5

You're right, Bush is dumb, the GOP is dumb and both the corporate parties are dumb. Both parties work for corporations, the military industrial complex and the corporate establishment. Why do you think Fox's Murdoch funded Hillary's last election? If you really think Hillary and Kerry are liberal, you're as dumb as box of rocks which makes you even dumber than Bush if that is possible. BTW, the dems didn't vote for war, they voted to give Bush the power to call it. It was a dumb move on their part, yes. Yet, it was all Bush's decision. And, he is making a complete disaster of it in Iraq. My god, I've heard many interviews with everyday Iraqies who wish they had their old tyrrant Saddam back. At least they could walk out on the streets safely. They are terrified now. Bush made a complete mess of that country and you cons are so proud of that, it's truly disgusting. And, there is no way Bush could pull off the 2000 election fraud by himself. He had Katherine harris and brother Jeb help him. He even had his buddies in the Supreme court help him with that one. The Dems aren't the smartest party on the planet, but it takes only one idiot Repuke president to ruin the lives of an entire country of people in the mid-east.

Answer 6

"Rarely is the question asked, is our children learning?"
President Bush

Bush did not rig the elections in Florida. That was left to Katherine Harris and his brother Jeb.

Bush did not mastermind 9/11. That was Osama bin Laden.

The UN did not pass resolutions to take out Saddam. The UN did not authorize our unprovoked invasion.

Bush has an honest looking face. When he lied, he had the backing of cherry picked staff at the Pentagon. He also stifled those who knew the truth. I guess you do have to have some smarts to pull that off. Probably Karl Rove was behind it.

It isn't hard to win confirmations when your party controls the legislature. He didn't do so well with Harriet Myers, who he called the best candidate for the job.

The Democrats are kind of dumb. They have been slow to react, and to recognize lies when they heard them. They have allowed political shenanigans to continue for far too long. Nor will they try to impeach the incompetent buffoon currently occupying the oval office. Democrats don't have the stomach for the vile, despicable acts of wanton wickedness we have seen pulled by the likes of Jack Abramoff, Newt Gingrich (committing adultery while going after the president for far less egregious behavior), Ralph Reed for bilking christians out of millions, laughing all the way to the bank--or the president for passing out Medals of Freedom like they were issued from a Pez Dispenser, and diverting public funds for faith based initiatives to buy votes, or simply robbing the US treasury in the name of rampant cronyism.

I thank God the Democrats are too dumb to pull off those kinds of deeds.

Answer 7

Because he is an idiot. He is able to connive enough to go after Saddam (avenge daddy's screw up at the expense of 2000 US troops and 3000 dead body's in NYC), but not smart enough not to be exposed as an incompetent liar.

Answer 8

i'm a Republican who happens to have a liberal view on immigration. in case you like people to rigidity the cost cut back and not 5 to 10 mph over, you ought to enforce that prompt - no longer all of sudden turn around and retroactively hand out thousands of tickets and droop all people's license for what we've all been doing for an fantastically long term. that's an unwritten contract that besides the actuality that technically unlawful, the law enforcement officers are going to enable you escape with going slightly over the cost cut back. we've been lax on imposing unlawful immigration and thought of any opposite direction. that's plenty much less complicated to coach people away on the border or deport them as quickly as their visa expires than to throw them in a much off places us of a as quickly as they have been here for many, some years and geared up a existence here. finally, we ought to shelter the border and to make certain who's here. in the event that they are no longer criminals, i've got not got a concern with a pathway to citizenship - and that i've got no longer any prefer to squeeze those people like many different conservatives seem to experience is needed. so a techniques as "leaping the line", the priority there is that there is a line in any respect. Our criminal immigration gadget is so screwed up that that's backing up people who ought to be waiting to circulate into and make contributions to the rustic. All of that's basically context... to respond to your question, I nevertheless have not got a concern with the term. The "unlawful" in "unlawful immigrant" denotes status - the comparable way we've "single people" and "married people". that's a factually precise ongoing status. The term has no longer something to do with race or racism. There are white unlawful immigrants too. How is the framing incorrect? basically because of the fact i'm no longer huge on punishment for a criminal offense we weren't properly imposing would not recommend they are no longer finally in charge and to blame for their very own movements. so a techniques as employers, in the previous many have not regularly happening (or extremely frankly tried to no longer understand) whether their workers have been unlawful or no longer. For those you could teach knowingly employed "unlawful immigrants", I have no difficulty calling them "unlawful employers" the two. go forward and upload that to the lexicon.

Answer 9

if he is not dumb, then how do you explain the war in irak ? yea you are right he is not dumb because it takes a genius to convince so many americans people that going to war is the only solution to end terrorism. my appologies-he is the best liar in the world

Answer 10

Money, powerful friends and a corrupt political machine have helped Bush to "manage" all of these feats..

Answer 11

he's evil too,,,,,

good heavens to mergatroid,,, why don't you want the truth from your government,,, can you not handle the truth,,,,

blaming Clinton for the past 7 years is getting old,,,
how many times did you hear Clinton blame daddy Bush,,,

get over yourself,,, get an education,,, read the papers,, Limbaugh and Hannity will dumb you down,, like they have the other 27% in your party.....