I won't vote for Hillary because she is a sociopath. I don't need any more reasons to oppose her.
2007-03-19 13:50:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
13⤊
2⤋
Yes, it would be a package deal. This type of question is asked all day, every day. It does not change the fact that Hillary is qualified to be an honorable President. The two of them have the highest IQ's of any political couple, America should be thankful.
2007-03-19 21:25:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by GO HILLARY 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
there replaced into fairly some mis-assistance and fabricated assistance coming from Bush and organisation, to coerce votes so the conflict should be waged. once you suspect the assistance to be precise, yet locate out later you've been lied to, all bets are off. so some distance as Obama - he did not vote for the conflict because he couldn't Vote for the conflict - he replaced into no longer a senator on the instantaneous. yet he DARN particular VOTED TO FUND IT - and once you vote to grant money to a reason - you for sure help the reason. So then - they are even. in person-friendly words Obama - again - is being deceptive about his position in all this. No wonder.
2016-11-26 23:13:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by bate 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
OK, let's put this in perspective, once and for all.
1. Clinton lied about diddling Monica. Body count: 0 (OK, 1 if you count the stained dress.)
2. Bush lied about WMD, Saddam, Katrina, and God knows what else. Body count: 100,000 and climbing daily.
You tell ME who the "low bred skunk" is now!
2007-03-20 18:52:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bostonian In MO 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Normally, I wouldn't take the time to answer trash questions but I'll just remind you that inspite of his personal failures (which is nobodys business except theirs), he was one of the greatest presidents we have ever had. He is brilliant, likeable, a great negotiator, huge intellect and a nice man.
70% of the married men in this country cheat on their wife and 52% of women cheat. We are generally an immoral bunch, we humans. We are all flawed in one way or another.
2007-03-19 11:47:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Heck no! 'Cat Daddy' Bill Clinton will drag this entire nation down in the middle of a crisis. While his old wife would be trying to deal with international problems she would need to take frequent breaks to monitor the baby cam to see what Cat Daddy's doing with those young hot babe interns.
It's just not worth our money. Elect a President and a family with higher moral standards than this lustful wild Bill nasty man. We would be the joke of the world if we elected a family knowing their criminal background from sexually harassing staff members to lying to the American people about his Cat Daddy status.
It's just not right....
2007-03-19 11:19:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stealth 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Yes, I'll be voting for her, because I can. It's a free damn country. Don't like that? Move to Iraq. At least the Clintons never tried to open the border and allow the illegals into the country...
2007-03-19 11:20:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lisa 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hillary would probably not be a very good president. On the plus side, she would be far, far superior to the bozo we are suffering now.
2007-03-19 11:23:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
"Low bred skunk . . ." Your words, not mine. And conservatives refer to liberals as elitists!
(I wish there was an emoticon for eye-rolling.)
2007-03-19 12:59:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by I am that damn good. 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yup
2007-03-19 14:48:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The proper question is: Would you vote for Clinton(s) knowing that both of them have destroyed the military among other things? Not to mention other people that turn up missing.
2007-03-19 11:19:02
·
answer #11
·
answered by wowwee 5
·
2⤊
3⤋