How was Saddam Hussein a threat to the world? Or to the U.S?

Answer 1

He wasn't. I'm just stickin around to see what the Cons are goin to say. This is gonna be funny.

There's one!!

Starla C - no credible answer and quite ironic

next!

Dumbhumper - same as Starla, wow a lil creepy.

George W - just like the real one, you didn't even answer the question.

5-stars - although I like your answer, you didn't answer the question. you beat around the bush (haha). The Bush Administration also violated the LOAC set forth by the Geneva convention. Saddam used weapons while in war. Bush Tortured and killed inmates. Both bad in my opinion.

sjsosullivan - Are you talking about Bush?? if so the deficit was a little lower, try -$378,000,000,000 when we went into Iraq.

BaMmO! give me another!

Answer 2

So, going by the logic that Saddam was a bad guy that needed to be ousted......should we invade all countries with bad leaders??? Or just the ones with the oil we want?

Stop lying to yourself. This war was about oil. If it was about removing an evil dictator then we would be constantly be at war with countries.

OUR SOLDIERS ARE DYING FOR OIL AND HELPING THE RICH GET RICHER!!!.....The sad part is....a lot of them don't know that. They're being led to believe that if we don't destroy Iraq, we're somehow going to lose our "Freedom" back home.

Answer 3

It started with his agression when he invaded kuwiat. Then when we went in there with all are allies, he used chemical biological warfare on the US troops as well as the troops surving in the Desert Storm War of 1991.

That was in violation of the Geneva Convention (rules of war set and goverened by the United Nations) who was all behind going in and taking care of the problem of Saddam.

This was actually a grounds for retaliation and going to War with Iraq. Where is the proof that he did this, because the troops as well as innocent civilians have come down with chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as being infected with a perasite, that is a STD.

Why do you suppose all of these strange aliments have sprung up throughout the World today. It was because of one mean greedy Dictator.

So to the best of my Military knowledge that gave the UN enough reason to go in an ousted him. Not only that Iraq should have been made to pay War retrobutions to all of the Nations whose people were affected by his violation of the United Nations rules of War.

Therefore the original coalition forces needs to join us in this resolve governing this War.

Answer 4

Saddam was a BAD guy. Now that that is settled let us ask the question: Who are the other bad guys in the world and what do we do about it? Can we start with N.Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, et cetera et cetera et cetera So what is the difference? Because Saddam plotted to kill Bush I ? Or could it be OIL? Naw Bush Cheney Inc. would never do that.

Answer 5

Where to start? He supported the Shah of Iran, attacked Kurds in his own and in other nations, supported terrorist organizations, brutally suppressed human rights of his citizens, allowed his sons free reign outside of the law, invaded other nations (once over religion, another time to rebound from a war debt of 75,000,000,000.00 +/-, while citing that the target was actually a part of his nation), violated UN directives that were conditions for a cessation of hostilities, etc...

Answer 6

i've seen the intelligence posted here before and i'm not going to bother posting it, but, i KNOW you must have read it here at least once. this is an old question. the WHOLE WORLD thought he was chasing wmd's. "move on..."

Answer 7

He wasn't a threat. His military was badly damaged in gulf war 1, and he was containted.

Answer 8

If you need to ask such a question then answering you is a total waste of precious time....dah!

Answer 9

he wasn't.
he was only a threat to his political adversaries in Iraq.
We had him well boxed in with no-fly zones and weapons inspectors.

Answer 10

nice job on giving retarded liberal jackasses and easy question to answer.