English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am NOT a proponant of government-run health care, I'm just curious if any nations besides the United State take a capitalistic approach to medicine so that I could see how it's working there.

I live near the U.S. / Canadian border so I get a sence of how socialized medicine works in Canada (it's a disastor, resulting in many Canadians coming to the U.S. for routine procedures that most Americans take for granted).

I would like to compare the U.S. system and the Canadian system with other nations.

Thanks for all answers.

2007-03-19 11:04:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

7 answers

I don't think we can compare the US to other countries for many, many reasons. Nor should the US lower its standards -- just because other countries have something doesn't mean the US should do the same thing.

2007-03-19 11:10:44 · answer #1 · answered by adammouthpiece 1 · 1 0

All Western countries seem to have adopted a hybrid private/public health care system with just the emphasis varying from one to another. The Massachusetts 2006 Health Reform Statute seems to go furthest along the road to a genuinely universal private health care model. The London School of Economics undertook an extensive comparative survey a few years back of various Health care systems (see source below)

2007-03-19 12:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by Perran 2 · 0 0

i think of there may be a hollow in the archives in that comparisons of what distinctive international locations pay in money does no longer say something approximately what's spent in keeping with guy or woman in each and every u . s . nor what the money is spent on. case in point what number MRI's of everybody is funded in Europe and Canada. yet another attention is our legal device. bypass to a legal professional right here after a site visitors twist of fate and watch the diagnostics bypass in the direction of the roof. besides the fact that in the event that they arrive back adverse, they're paid for and that gets lumped in. All deaths are are counted evem those no longer concerning a scientific condition. There additionally are comments that the government platforms do no longer desire to authorize diagnostics too at as quickly as. you rather ought to envision the media shops in those international locations to work out if the rather skewed archives help what's being suggested. I did, i've got additionally been over there, I even have adequate formal archives training to be attentive to they might rather be skewed, I see how social protection, medicare, medicaid have fee greater suitable than anticipated (which additionally is going into the numbers of what we pay, approximately 40% of what we pay) and so i'm skeptical approximately what we are being fed. additionally notice that we at the instant import ill people from 0.33 international international locations to spice up adverse effects.

2016-10-19 02:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Japan, I think, but don't hold me to that. All western European countries have public healthcare for all, and although there are complaints and waiting lines and funding problems and so on, it works pretty well.

2007-03-19 11:07:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

All the European countries have it, maybe one of the industrialized asian countries like Japan.

2007-03-19 11:11:23 · answer #5 · answered by jlk15 3 · 0 0

When you get those numbers put together would you also look at the tax burden. That will tell you more of the story.

2007-03-19 11:11:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

maybe

2007-03-19 11:14:32 · answer #7 · answered by georgewallace78 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers