English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Wilson was a republican

2007-03-19 10:02:49 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

dum repukes
YES HE DID COMMMIT TREASON
FACT

2007-03-19 10:10:37 · update #1

11 answers

Don't claim it when you can't prove it. That's known as SLANDER.

2007-03-19 10:08:00 · answer #1 · answered by senior citizen 5 · 2 2

Well your name clearly says it all. Are you the typical, young, non-too bright Liberal? No facts, name call. Hmmm, what an intelligent, well thought out way to approach this. Never mind that try as they might, the Democratic prosecuter, Fitzpatrick, could not find a crime was commited. Oh yeah, don't confuse the Libs with facts.
Winston Churchill said "If you're not a Liberal by the time you're 20, you have no heart. If you're not a Conservative by the time you're 40, you have no brain."
BTW, Joe Wilson is a Democrat, which Wilson are you refering to?
And for Peace, Love and Harmony, get your facts straight. Valerie Plame was not covert. There is a definition inside the CIA and leagally there is a definition. She meets neither. She does try to play the angle though. It's funny isn't it, how some will take someone at their word, if their beliefs are the same and call anyone who disagrees, a liar or say they have ulterior motives, if their beliefs are different?

2007-03-19 10:11:20 · answer #2 · answered by Partisanshipsux 3 · 1 1

sure and right this is why a million. Richard Armitage leaked the archives to Bob Woodward and characterised the archives as something each and every person knew 2. Woodward replace into under the effect that the archives replace into no longer secret or comfortable 3. Andrea Mitchell suggested that everybody knew 4. David Gregory Knew 5. Gregory and Mitchell the two labored for Russert. With the potential implications of this tale, this is totally achieveable that they shared this intel with their boss 6. Russert testimony replace into shaky - exceedingly while he claimed no longer recalling his "first time in one hundred years" line that he repeated particularly some circumstances in the wake of the indictment this is greater suitable than adequate sensible doubt

2016-10-19 02:38:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I can not imagine a more corrupt administration and believe we will find out soon just how much of a mess they have made. I do not believe their house of cards will be standing much longer. The truth will come out and in years to come and this administration will be for and away known as the most corrupt ever! maybe even blamed for the next depression after draining our treasury.

2007-03-23 09:30:21 · answer #4 · answered by controlac 3 · 0 0

No, Joe Wilson committed treason by giving aid and comfort to our enemies with his lies.

2007-03-20 02:44:00 · answer #5 · answered by dsl67 4 · 0 0

IT IS CLEAR THAT CHENEY WAS DEEPLY INVOLVED IN THE LEAK.

This is a great piece by John Dean, which presents the case that Karl Rove BROKE A LAW which is JUST AS IMPORTANT as the law against revealing the identity of a covert agent.

The media has focused on that one law, but a U.S. Citizen was prosecuted and IMPRISONED under a different law for LEAKING INFORMATION WHICH WAS MUCH LESS DAMAGING THAN KARL ROVE'S LEAK.

CHECK IT OUT:


http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/15/dean.rove/

HERE IS A BRIEF EXCERPT, BUT PLEASE READ THE WHOLE ARTICLE:


I have in mind the laws invoked by the Bush Justice Department in the relatively minor leak case that it vigorously prosecuted, though it involved information that was not nearly as sensitive as that which Rove provided Matt Cooper (and possibly others).

I am referring to the prosecution and conviction of Jonathan Randel. Randel was a Drug Enforcement Agency analyst, a Ph.D. in history, working in the Atlanta office of the DEA.

Randel was convinced that British Lord Michael Ashcroft (a major contributor to Britain's Conservative Party, as well as American conservative causes) was being ignored by DEA and its investigation of money laundering. (Lord Ashcroft is based in South Florida and the off-shore tax haven of Belize.)

Randel leaked the fact that Lord Ashcroft's name was in the DEA files, and this fact soon surfaced in the London news media. Ashcroft sued, and learned the source of the information was Randel. Using his clout, soon Ashcroft had the U.S. attorney in pursuit of Randel for his leak.

Judge Story told Randel that he surely must have appreciated the risks in leaking DEA information. "Anything that would affect the security of officers and of the operations of the agency would be of tremendous concern, I think, to any law-abiding citizen in this country," the judge observed. Judge Story concluded this leak of sensitive information was "a very serious crime."

"In my view," he explained, "it is a very serious offense because of the risk that comes with it, and part of that risk is because of the position" that Randel held in DEA. But the risk posed by the information Rove leaked is multiplied many times over; it occurred at a time when the nation was considering going to war over weapons of mass destruction. And Rove was risking the identity of, in attempting to discredit, a WMD proliferation expert, Valerie Plame Wilson.

Judge Story acknowledged that Randel's leak did not appear to put lives at risk, nor to jeopardize any DEA investigations. But he also pointed out that Randel "could not have completely and fully known that in the position that [he] held."

...

Is not the same true of Rove? Rove had no idea what the specific consequences of giving a reporter the name of a CIA agent (about whom he says he knew nothing) would be--he only knew that he wanted to discredit her (incorrectly) for dispatching her husband to determine if the rumors about Niger uranium were true or false.

Given the nature of Valerie Plame Wilson's work, it is unlikely the public will ever know if Rove's leak caused damage, or even loss of life of one of her contracts abroad, because of Rove's actions. Dose anyone know the dangers and risks that she and her family may face because of this leak?

2007-03-19 10:10:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

To a liberal, breaking a nail while working it treason.

2007-03-19 12:06:02 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin A 6 · 0 0

No he did not commit Treason. But he violated our national security laws. By releasing Top secret information.

2007-03-19 10:10:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

#1- No.
#2- Which CIA leak?

Comment- Your point?

2007-03-19 10:08:09 · answer #9 · answered by ML 5 · 1 2

Yes he did.

2007-03-19 10:06:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers