Good question, I guess it's a good thing that everyone on earth isn't gay, huh?
2007-03-19 09:42:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by jjspike 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Just like we do now. Being gay doesn't mean that you can't sometimes have intercourse (revolting as the idea might be! Kidding. Many of the participants here are parents and gay). Plus there's donated sperm, etc. However, the prospect of the whole world being gay is unlikely, however much one might wish it.
2007-03-19 09:51:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Artificial Insemination
2007-03-19 09:42:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by nycguy10002 7
·
6⤊
0⤋
The gay male couples would hire a surrogate mother.
The lesbian couples would use artificial insemination.
Just think...NO unwanted pregnancies, abortion would be unheard of. The population would be under control.
Why are the conservatives so against homosexuality again?
2007-03-19 09:52:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Harry_Cox 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, artificial insemination as everyone is saying. Also, there are studies that lesbian couples raise the most well-adjusted and successful children, so it might actually be for the better...
2007-03-19 09:51:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
gays and lesbians have been doing this for decades, it's called artificial incimination, or doing it the old fashion way. gay man and lesbian often times will have 2 kids one for each couple. so no we don't need str8 people to populate the world
2007-03-19 09:43:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Evolution would equipt us with anything we need to reproduce. Evolution has worked for us before!
2007-03-19 09:52:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by toxicPoison 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have 2 kids and I'm a gay man. You figure it out.
2007-03-19 09:49:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by ron s 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
The same way that many people already are these days. Artificial insemination and surrogacy.
2007-03-19 09:43:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lilly 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Duh! The SAME way heterosexuals do when one of them cannot have a child! Get a sperm donor to inseminate a female. You can do it by turkey baster or by a yucky moment of intercourse.
(For those of you who believe that "the purpose of sex is reproduction" - THAT'S CRAP! Sex is ALSO for just pleasure. Lots of heterosexuals don't enjoy sex and they have kids!) Is it WRONG for heterosexual women to get artificially inseminated when their husbands can't impregnate them?! I am sure they don't invite other men to come have intercourse to get pregnant! But I suppose YOU think it'd be ok for a heterosexual woman to get artificially inseminated. PLEASE.
2007-03-19 10:11:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
But everyone on this earth would never be all gay.
We'd always have "Die Gays!" and "Dr. LuLu" and of course, "Queen Olga".
2007-03-19 09:43:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by ~ Lillie ~ 4
·
2⤊
0⤋