What Party during World War II Detained Many US Citizens in Camps without Trials or any Due Process?

Answer 1

Who are The Democrats?

(Sorry, but I couldn't help myself)

Answer 2

The sneak attack on Pearl Harbor by Japan that precipitated World War 2 was over 65 years ago. The U.S. had never experienced anything of this sort or proportion in it's history and FDR, the leader of the Democratic Party responded in a manner supported by the entire nation both militarily overseas and on the home front. If your question is intended to excuse Bush's actions In Iraq and here at home, it won't wash, as two thirds of the nation do not at this time support Bush's actions and have indeed said so at the ballot box. The Democrats had overwhelming support all through WW2.
Nice try though. BTW, were you even born yet during those years?

Answer 3

i do no longer think of u.s. gained the conflict for us, that's a techniques from being an effortless equation. We have been being offered by utilising the individuals for a while and had a lot of yankee pilots flying with us from the united kingdom in the previous the U. S. formally joined in. We held the line and destroyed the Luftwaffe at a key factor regardless of the undeniable fact that. no longer long after that the Germans made a super tactical mistake by utilising invading Russia, and on the incorrect time of three hundred and sixty 5 days too. The Russians weathered that onslaught with vast loss of protection rigidity and civilian lives, then counterattacked Germany, at last pushing them each and all of the before to Berlin. the genuine question could be, might Russian Communism be as vulnerable is that's as we talk if it had no longer had to bow to the NATO (inclusive of u.s.) regulations of a thank you to cut up up Germany and something of jap Europe...

Answer 4

The Democratic Party.

Answer 5

That would be the Democratic Party. That is a different Democratic Party than we have today. If you had a clue, you would realize party philosophies swapped somewhere in the 50's. Many who were in the Democratic Party in the 40's, like Strom Thurmond for example, would surely be Republicans today.

Answer 6

The Democrat under FDR. It was sad but many people were afraid of Japanese Americans. It was a matter of national security and besides, Bush even said that the Democratic party of Today isn't like FDR. So in a way he is admiring his tactics. Every Republican here says "Democrats of today aren't like FDR". In a way they liked FDR and what he did.

Answer 7

I like how the taliberals act like this is ancient history and the democrat party would never do anything like that again...

Insight on the News, June 28, 1993 by Amos Permutter

Clinton's FDR-style approach to foreign policy is damaging.

President Clinton has shown a keen desire to emulate two strong and charismatic presidents: Franklin D. Roosevelt and John F. Kennedy. And his emulation of FDR is especially strong.

On the domestic front, Clinton has attempted nothing less than a second economic revolution in American history -- even though the current sluggish economy hardly warrants the drastic measures suitable Depression.

But it's in foreign affairs that Clinton most closely (and not to his credit) resembles FDR, adopting Roosevelt's dissembling and often seemingly vacillating style without achieving Rooseveltian results or displaying a clear goal.

FDR's White House style, most scholars conclude today, was characterized by confusion, by a profusion of aides who spent much of their time trying to outguess and anticipate the president, and by the practice of surrogate diplomacy that tended to cover up the president's indecision. Roosevelt was notorious for his tendency to procrastinate, waiting for events to spur policy, never designing a strategy for dealing with impending or actual war.

Clinton's decision-making process in foreign policy, such as it is, strongly resembles FDR's. It suffers markedly from a plurality of channels and information. When he's forced to focus on foreign policy, which he does reluctantly, he tends to handle it on his own, blocking out advisers or keeping his real intentions from them. Like Roosevelt, he wants to hold all the cards and keep them close to his vest, a tendency that frustrates advisers and allies and sends confusing signals to international rivals. Clinton's unorthodox management style is in the classic Rooseveltian mode -- except that it is ineffective.

And Mrs. Clinton is wanting to run in 08', should we expect any less from her?

Answer 8

That would be Franklin D. Roosevelt of the Democratic Party.

But in case you dont know this, a political party doesnt make decisions like that. Presidents do. And FDR has quite a list of not-so-impressive things he did. He was by far not the greatest president.

Answer 9

The Democratic party did. Now, it seems like the Republicans have taken a page right out of their handbook by doing the same thing.

Answer 10

Who cares! Republicans and Democrates are different sides of the same evil self serving coin!

Question: What party is currently doing the same thing with secret CIA prison camp overseas?

Answer: Bush, Jr. SUCKS!

Answer 11

The same party as the one of the people who are now seeking to undermine Bush's much more modest measures to DEFEND the country!