A 13 year oldsoccer player serves a 35 day ban,enforced by the the local county FA after the ban the league decide to ban him again for the rest of the season.
Is this a breach of his human rights?
2007-03-19 09:11:44 · 7 answers · asked by GARY J 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
What was his offence? I mean that punishment is a little harsh. In answer to your question, no it is not a violation of his human rights. Any association, group,or club has the right to recind membership for any infraction they deem incompatable to their group. I am sure that you could find some ordinance in your town's charter.
2007-03-19 09:28:12 · answer #1 · answered by robert s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure which "right" would be violated - after all there is no constitutional "right" to play soccer. There is the privilege of playing soccer.
Because you failed to mention the reason for the ban that speaks volumes. There are logical consequences to our actions, and if the person violated the rules then the consequence is that he cannot play soccer. Life lesson learned (not learned if mom and dad run around sayin how wronged he was for being banned for breaking the rules).
2007-03-19 16:27:02 · answer #2 · answered by Susie D 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Firstly this is not a human rights questiom...What you need to do is take a judicial review action, to allow the courts to proplerly examine and investigate why the football league made that decisin to ban you. If the cour rules in your favor they can reverse that decsion and they would have to allow you to play!!! if not then you remain banned!
2007-03-19 16:50:34 · answer #3 · answered by hershey's kisses 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You just forgot to mention why they banned him twice. I think that means an awful lot to the answer.
For other answerers: Bans have been lifted as unfair if they have discriminated against religious headgear etc. So there are rights attached to participation that are covered by human rights legislation.
2007-03-19 16:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by grapeshenry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Playing sports is a privilege, not a right. A lot of people seem to have those confused these days.
Rights are inalienable, privileges can be removed at will.
2007-03-19 16:20:08 · answer #5 · answered by DimensionalStryder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he obviously did something wrong. That is completely ridiculous. Human rights have nothing to do with sports.
2007-03-19 16:15:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no human right to soccer.,..
2007-03-19 16:16:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋