Didn't Henry Waxman expertly use a tactic?

Question

the libs claim Bill O'Reilly uses?

What was so threatening about Victoria Teoensing's testimony?

Being one of the key people to help draft the Intelligence Identities Protection Act of 1982, Toensing has been retained by a number of media organizations to give commentary on the Plame Affair. In March 2005 Toensing authored an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Matt Cooper and Judith Miller, two journalists who were subpoenaed in the Valerie Plame investigation for refusing to reveal information obtained from confidential sources.

In the brief, she argued that "there exists ample evidence in the public record to cast serious doubt as to whether a crime has even been committed under the Intelligence Protection Act in the investigation underlying the attempts to secure testimony from Miller and Cooper."[citation needed] She also contended that Ms. Plame didn't have a cover to blow, citing a July 23, 2004 article in the Washington Times which argued that Valerie Plame's status as an

If it's word for word send me the link. I searched answers and nothing showed up.

This is the only question in the past 2 weeks with Henry Waxman in it.

None of you libs seem to be able to read a question and answer it.

Neddie: keep clickin your heals together and repeating that, it doesn' t make it in the least bit true.

Answer 1

Anbody watching could see that Waxman was just trying to divert from the fact that Teoensing did, in fact, know what she was talking about. Valerie Plam was not a covert agent at the time of of the article. The proof of this is that Fitzgerald was unable to charge anyone with violation of the Intelligence Protection Act.

Answer 2

He didn't want to let Ms. Toensig speak after he realized she knew and understood more about the law than he did.

Henry Waxman? He sure looks familiar...Did he play Ralph the Doorman on the Jeffersons?

Answer 3

Now republicans go all Clinton and want to use minutia to argue semantics, Gen Hayden says she was covert and he's your appointee, also to hell with that whole train of thought what about all the contacts she developed that were jeopardized, how many lives were put at stake for a game of political payback you should be ashamed, rather than care what's really right you want to argue about what IS IS, screw that you either care about your country's security or you don't and judging by your stance on this issue YOU DON'T

Answer 4

wishing and thinking the evidence away,, won't change what Cheney-Bush did,, they deliberately and diabolically outed a covert operative of the CIA,, working for the US Government to help stop WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION from getting into the hands of our enemies,,,, George Bush wouldn't deal with N. Korea,, until Kim Jong-il,, had 6 nuclear weapons in his arsenal, then he made the deal he said he would not make,,, flip-flop,,,,, ,,, Ahmadinejad, president of Iran,, will most likely have WMD too,, because George W. is too ignorant to know how diplomacy works,, Condi Rice is not qualified to be Secretary of State,, no more than Al Gonzales is qualified to be Attorney General,, or Donald Rumsfeld was to be Secretary of Defense,,,,, Gonzales is acting as the presidents chief law officer and legal counsel,,, not Americas,,,,, the Bush team is not and never has been,,, Acting in the Best Interest of American Citizens,,, he makes a mockery of our nations laws,, and our justice system,,, he wants all illegal immigrants here from Mexico to have amnesty,,, why,, to get Republican votes,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Mr. Bush is,, ,, without a doubt,, the WORST PRESIDENT IN US HISTORY,,, he has betrayed his country and it's citizens.

IMPEACH BUSH-CHENEY !

Answer 5

I could swear i have seen someone ask this exact same question before. Like every single word was the same. Huh.