The largest difference between Greek and Roman architecture is that Roman architecture used curves throughout the building. The buildings usually contained domes and circular figures, and were circularly shaped throughout. A great majority of Greek architecture used straight lines, except for the columns.
2007-03-19 08:41:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Keta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
this isn't any longer the names this is the genuine difference between the Greek and Roman gods. one is that the Greeks have been the 1st. the Romans attacked the Greeks with none "genuine gods". as quickly as they gained the conflict, they knew that the Greeks have been lengthy previous, so they took their gods and "mounted them" to greater healthful their personalities and lives. additionally, the Greeks have been in Greece, and their effectual around the corner enemies, the Romans have been from Rome till now destroying the Greeks and shifting in. so in different words the gods have been "born" in distinctive places. the Greeks have been greater non violent than the Romans and did no longer attempt to take over different cities or what ever. there for the gods that they worshiped had very distinctive personalities. the names DO have something to the version, besides the fact that if this isn't any longer the certainty that they are spelled in yet differently or are not the comparable, it rather is what they mean. because of the fact the personalities are distinctive it would not make sence to be named something you're no longer rather. this is like being named dirt or dirt, yet you're clean. stupid suited? right this is an occasion of a million of the gods: Hades skill "the wealthy one" and Pluto skill "the silent one ". i'm hoping that this archives will help absolutely everyone will the comparable question " what's the version between the Greek and Roman gods. :)
2016-10-19 02:29:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference between Roman and Greek architecture is the arch - which the Romans had and the Greeks did not.
The arch allowed the Romans to build larger and taller structures than the Greeks. So the Romans built on a more massive scale - including aquaducts that ran for miles.
The use of circular buildings is Greek, but belongs in the Hellenistic period after the classical period. The Mausoleum of Halicarnasus is a prime example of a round Greek building.
So round Roman buildings look non-Greek if you are comparing them to the classical Greek buildings and not the Hellenistic.
2007-03-19 10:31:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by dugfromthearth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think this one is best answered by the "which came first: the chicken or the egg?" Roman architecture was hardly original. In fact, they borrowed heavily from the Greeks and most of their buildings were in the Hellinistic style (which is the age of development in the Greek city-states after the death of Alexander).......even their famous "arch" is borrowed from the Etruscans. Ancient Roman architecure is therefore a fusion of Hellinistic Greek styles and Etruscan......
I think the difference would be in materails used....most structures in Rome and indeed some parts of the Ancient Roman world were made out of travetine marble, which is locally found. They were also the first to start using concrete widely and many non-public buildings are made out of concrete....that is how they were able to build appartments several stories high (what we might call a low-mid rise structure in today's terminology)
2007-03-19 08:43:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by boston857 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Architecture of Ancient Rome adopted the external language of classical Greek architecture for their own purposes, which were so different from Greek buildings as to create a new architectural style. The two styles are often considered one body of classical architecture.
Just look both up on wikipedia... they both have extensive articles with links.
2007-03-19 08:42:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by doodlebuttus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Romans got a lot of influence of Greeks architecture ( I don't want to say the copied it) they modified Greeks' styles, for example the Corinthians one, they had a more "queeny" additions. However, they create the arc. In addition to the use of arc, Romans invented the aqueduct, and had an excellent and well planned road system ( bridges included).
2007-03-20 22:43:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by ernesto b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
roman pillars expand in the middle to make them look big
greek pillars have the grooves running virtically
romans genernlly more advanced--they made aquducts ect.
2007-03-19 08:45:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by BillyG2 3
·
0⤊
0⤋