2007-03-19 07:20:50 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
I think they should, i hate it when one city has two pro sports leagues. I don't care how big the city is. I don't think that's fair.
2007-03-19 07:23:40 · answer #1 · answered by mike b 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anaheim's market is too small to support an NBA team. it's population is a measly 342,410 and Kansas City isn't much bigger.
San Diego has the population to support a NBA (city population: 1,255,540 and Metro population: 2,933,462), but I'm not sure it the residents would be willing to pay for a new stadium. Sacramento is having that seem problem.
Las Vegas would be the best choice, since it has a large enough population to support the team and its desire for a NBA team is extremely high. Not to mention the extra support the team would ger from the tourist population.
2007-03-19 07:47:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Granted I hadn't heard of this possibility until now, but Anaheim seems like the most likely scenario.
Kansas City - Probably the second choice, they haven't had an NBA team in over 20 years; maybe they get another chance?
San Diego - Been there, done that.
Las Vegas - Will get first shot at the Kings.
2007-03-19 07:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by Tony M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They used to play in San Diego, however the owner isn't Al Davis, so they does no longer flow lower back. No way in hell they bypass to San Francisco. they might have actual no followers in any respect. Anaheim does no longer artwork the two, because of the fact this is rather the comparable factor. actually, they might flow to Seattle, as they love basketball up there, yet i'm exceedingly advantageous Seattle might desire a clean franchise over the ******* la Clippers. the main suitable risk may be Las Vegas, however the subject is that basketball having a risk might must be banned. because of the fact of this no activities team will ever flow there. There rather isn't any place to choose for the lonely la Clippers.
2016-10-19 02:22:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know if they should move, but if they do I hope its to KC. We have this great, brand new arena that is just sitting there lifeless. I was hoping to get the Penguins in there for a hockey team, but that won't happen now. They tried to get the Hornets to move there and that fell through, maybe the Clippers could call it home.
2007-03-19 10:55:07 · answer #5 · answered by DoReidos 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
anaheim would be good fit! but las vegas? do not think so! san diego? didn't they already do that? after the buffalo braves in 70's? they ahd bill walton, right? so that is out!
2007-03-19 07:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They used to play in San Diego. I think they should stay in L.A.
2007-03-19 07:24:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vegas baby!! We nead a team here, and I could rally around the Clips!!
2007-03-19 10:42:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont care but get them out of LA they are a joke
2007-03-19 07:23:56 · answer #9 · answered by Erica Giselle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋