Part 1: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070319074903AAkxvF6
Part 2: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070319082549AAUu2Oy
Part 3: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AtdcTcM9vbcLY4752nFTaFHsy6IX?qid=20070319105751AAMjIwC
Try the others, as well. My introduction is in part 1.
This one is hardcore. Do not read this if you are not strong.
Part 4:
A madman has a secret bunker that he has abducted 50 babies from a local hospital to. He calls you on the phone and tells you to go outside your door. On the steps, is a newborn baby. He commands you to torture, cook, and eat the baby for him, while recording it, or he will kill the other 50 babies in the most horrific way possible.
If you do not complete the task within one day, he will also bomb several more infirmaries, and he will do so also if he detects any kind of trickery or police involvement.
Can you be heartless, cruel, and cannibalistic in order to save 50 babies?
2007-03-19 07:10:49 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Psychology
He's called me on the phone so he can't see me (you didn't make it specific so I get to) I'm to record and then send it to him I guess? I take the child into the kitchen and I prep the kitchen, i.e get out a chicken from the fridge (call for help on my phone and a friend comes to help me) I call the dude back or make my recording. I would stick it's feet as gentely as I could so I could just get crying and try not to have it bleed, I'd lie to the dude about what I was doing, I might even act a bit and say I enjoyed it. After a while I would have the friend safely incapitate the baby (shut it up basicly) in some way. Next with my chicken out of the fridege I would do whatever to make him think I was preparing it. Meanwhile he is distracted on the phone the friend would have contacted police and FBI and tell them what is what, I would have to put my faith in authoirties and keep the dude on the phone distracted as I prepare the baby/chicken. I would hope I could act well enough that he couldn't tell. it's the only option there is.
2007-03-21 07:39:03 · answer #1 · answered by Kam 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh my. Absolutely not. I couldn't do it, even if 50 other babies lives were at stake. I would have one day to inform the police of what was going on. This madman would bomb the infirmaries anyways 'cause I would refuse to do what he wanted, so I might as well get the police and FBI involved.
2007-03-21 07:33:17 · answer #2 · answered by chicyuna 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I could never kill the baby either. I would most likely try to find the killer myself, and walk into some stupid trap getting myself killed before i knew what hit me, but at least i did not do nothing and the babies have a chance.
2007-03-22 12:34:50 · answer #3 · answered by Firefly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your existence is spared the two way. What concerns is your determination. Do you fake which you're being altruistic in direction of your relatives, yet in effortless terms by utilising permitting yet another 25,000 to die? Is it a count of religion, which you will have faith his insurance? might God placed all of us in that place? i think of i'm going to experience like a crumb if I sent 25,000 extra people to their death, for the sake of fifty,000 nearer to domicile. For all all of us understand, the persons might actually be extra perfect than us. Too many what ifs to even evaluate a decision.
2016-10-02 09:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Episode 4 ... hey it's like Columbo!
2007-03-24 15:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by just me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course no
2007-03-21 07:08:03 · answer #6 · answered by micho 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are one sick puppy.
2007-03-19 16:51:31 · answer #7 · answered by georgiagolfer72 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hell no.
2007-03-20 02:53:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋