Read this article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070319/ap_on_go_co/fired_prosecutors
Does Bush make every decision on a hunch?
2007-03-19 07:00:34 · 12 answers · asked by Not so looney afterall 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
This is actually an excellent question and I would like to have a concrete answer ... but I think that will be a long time in coming, if it ever does!
Bush, like Reagan, is personified by a shocking and self-admitted lack of curiosity. His willingness to let others make the tough decisions will not endear him to history. As partisan as this may sound (and I assure you it is not), both of these Presidents are largely puppets of much more learned individuals.
The only thing that Bush and Reagan were interested in was advancing an extremely conservative agenda (which, it should be noted, often falls way outside of traditional conservative "values").
I don't believe either of these individuals understood, in any substantial way, either the history of the world or the longterm ramifications of their decisions.
Bush likes to say that he's the - ahem - "decision maker," but I think it's pretty obvious that he has followed some exceptionally bad advice from his administration because he lacks the ability to think critically. Even the most fundamental elements of reason seem to be beyond his reach as is evident by exceptionally poor communication skills.
2007-03-19 07:22:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You cite an article on the Democratic witch-hunt regarding the fired US attorneys. Which decision are you talking about when you question his decision-making process? [I'm just trying to clarify your question]
If the decision is about keeping Gonzalez as AG, the fact is that he's done nothing wrong. As for the firings, again, nothing wrong was done.
And the only decision that has me puzzled is that Bush hasn't told Congress to go piss up a rope, he isn't letting his people testify under oath in this circus trial.
2007-03-19 14:26:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush's decision making process remains a mystery to the most enlightened of scientests. Some think he bases his decisions on the feeling in his little toe.
Seriously, I think he knows what's actually going on and makes his decisions according to his own agenda and thinks up his reasoning later.
2007-03-19 16:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by witchiebunny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a complex series of "rock, paper, scissors" Just Bush and the 'inner circle'
It's easy to run the country on a hunch when you aren't affected (or anyone in your family) by any negative consequences.
2007-03-19 14:13:33 · answer #4 · answered by words_smith_4u 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Its like a boy at school give me back my oil money. Dump GOP
2007-03-19 15:33:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand your question. Should Bush just fire people because of democrats start whining about yet another non issue? The only crime Bush committed was to not fire every last one of them when he first came into office just as Clinton did. He had hope for bipartisan support, but again it is biting him in the ***.
2007-03-19 14:08:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
he reads all pertinate info then checks with advisors then tries to make the best decision. he's acurate most of the time
2007-03-19 14:08:27 · answer #7 · answered by al s 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's inexplicable, and definitely defies logic or reason
2007-03-19 14:11:40 · answer #8 · answered by * * 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
That's why they call him the decider.
Gonzo, you're doin' aheckuvajob!!
2007-03-19 14:08:41 · answer #9 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
he flips a coin if its head he goes ahead and does what he planned if its tails he doesnt.
2007-03-19 14:07:44 · answer #10 · answered by GQsmooth 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋