difference between a terrorist an insurgent and a freedom fighter?

Question

in terms of legal,socio-political,socio-economic ideology etc

Answer 1

Lets be all of us, freedom people, please. Mr. Bush started the 5th unfair war with Iraq, smiling, Why? There are more than 22,000 young boys with wounds, 3,200 death, a deficit of more than 400 billion dollars. Is he crazy? Or maybe all of us are crazy? How many guys do you know with this type of cynic smile? Are they dangerous? Do you agree? Lets help The Noble People of America to be united again, with the Ideology accepted by all cultures and by Jews, Hindus, Christians, Muslims and men of Good Will: "Lets all of us, become to be: Genuinely Sincere, Grateful and Respectful with The One Who Gave us Life, with Mother Nature, and with ourselves" If you like this mail, please send again to all politicians, please.
I will send to you as my gift in format e-book, my "AWARENESS, The Meaning of Life" if you ask to my address mail.

Answer 2

The answer to that depends entirely on which side of the assumed conflict you are. For the most part, though, terrorist and insurgent would be lumped in the same category.
In our own history every fighter in the Revolution was a freedom fighter on the west side of the Atlantic, while he was a terrorist/insurgent in England. In the same breath, every American settler was an insurgent to the Native Americans, whose warriors were viewed as freedom fighters in the villages and terrorists in the settlers' cabins.

Answer 3

Let me see:

A terrorist is a person who blindly fights for a belief system. They are closed minded people with singleminded determination.

An insurgent is a person who might or might not also be a terrorist. They cross the border to stop what they feel (or their government feels) isn't good for the country they live in. And the country they crossed the border to fight in. These people may or may not be openminded enough to negotiate with.

A freedom fighter is a person who feels oppressed by their ruling government and is fighting to get out from under that yoke of oppression.

Answer 4

Terrorist is one that will cause mass terror anywhere. An insurgent is someone that is from another country going to fight just because they get to kill people. They are somewhat like a mercenary who is hired to go kill people and a freedom fighter is someone stupid enough to believe they are fighting for a freedom that will never happen. If they have to murder people in order to be free then they are not fighting for freedom, they are fighting because their leaders are telling them to.

They all fall under the term terrorists.

Answer 5

Terrorists want nothing to do with law or order. Their goals are twofold, chaos and anarchy.

An insurgent fights against a government whose base was formed from within the country.

Freedom fighters fight to obtain freedom of choice from a foreign country who is ruling their country.

Answer 6

A terrorist murders innocent people.

An insurgent trys to overthrow the government by force.

A freedom fighter fights for Liberal Liberties.

Answer 7

Nothing, the only difference is the subjective observer, if you are fighting in your nation to rid it of an occupation you are a freedom fighter, however to the occupying force you are an insurgent.

Answer 8

Terrorists use fear to sway the masses to either support their goals or to frighten them into complacency so they may further their own agenda. popular methods are attacks and propaganda.
Freedom fighters strive to oust occupying forces so the best interests of the people may be furthered. popular methods are guerrilla attacks, homemade ordinance, snipering.
Insurgents has become a catch all word for both terrorists and freedom fighters.

Answer 9

effortless. even as they are struggling with for the freedom of their people which many concept the Afghans doing in Afghanistan yet having gained the country, they grew to develop into the country right into a genocidal penal complex camp a lot worse the Russian puppet regime ever replaced into. They went from freedom wrestle to terrorist. also, freedom warring parties wrestle they do no longer kill women individuals and little ones and need to win with assistance from horror. the yank revolution replaced into no longer about killing the households of people, they were about pushing the British out of the colonies. Clearlyfreedom warring parties can inflict damage on present day armies yet terrorists opt for somewhat to blow up college buses and females individuals in the marketplace to purchase food for his or her fafamilies you do not see that and performance come to settle for that killing of noncombatants is okay and in reality you should make it seem noble and courageous. Seven 3 hundred and sixty 5 days old little ones on college buses at the instantaneous are not a lot of a risk on your "terrorist/freedom fighter" and adult adult males on their thanks to their jobs at the instantaneous are not armed so that they are ordinary targets. Thats the enormous difference. once you assert jap us of a you advise Boston and the Irish community, thats no longer us of a or individuals those are those who're in simple terms hiding out elsewhere cuz its risk-free. no individual ever called the Viet Cong terrorists, they werefightingg of their united states adverse to a overseas military. Blowing up place of work homes or lodges and targeted on unarmed those who've no particular dedication to something is in simple terms cowardly habit.

Answer 10

the main difference is how they are written into the history books.. and who writes the books...

example: if the terrorists were to take over Iraq they would write their own history and call themselves liberators and freedom fighters.. whereas we would still write them into history as terrorists.

the founding fathers were traitors until we won.



Edit: I think that terrorists are spineless bastards.. Just trying to answer the question in an honest way.

Answer 11

the bad guys are the good guys are the bad guys. democracy - big deal and lies. we don,t even have democracy in north america and if we do ,it doesn,t work .mr bush has created a country where thugs and theives flourish - wait a minute ,that sounds too much like north america congrats george on a job well done !