While it is important to consider your age and risk tolerance, I think 20-30% in core holdings is foolhardy.
I am in my early 30s and have been both very happy and very successful with a 70% core holding composed of Vanguard's Total International Stock Index Fund, Total Bond Fund, and S&P 500 Index Fund. I tend to tweak the percentages of those three funds a bit depending on how I feel about the global economy, but have held essentially those three funds for several years now.
A 20-30% allocation to satellite investments is much more realistic and lets you sleep at night knowing the majority of your money is in big, relatively safe index funds.
2007-03-19 11:52:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by hundreddegreesintheshade 1
·
2⤊
0⤋
i believe the answer to this question depends on how old you are. if you are younger, as in under 30, i believe that your portfolio should have a riskier approach. i would put the core holdings at around 25-30% at this point (assuming these are the safest). at around age 50, i would titrate that up to 50-60% core holdings. at age 65, depending on how rich you have or haven't become, i would keep no less than 80-90% of your portfolio value in the safest of investments, like an REIT or an ETF with a diesel dividend.
2007-03-19 13:48:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sam 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
It epends on your age and your professional (steady) income. You always want a balance of risky vs safe holdings, and of short vs long run holdings.
2007-03-19 13:46:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by browneyedgirl 6
·
0⤊
0⤋