English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

And he shouldn’t have another chance to cause more problems for our great nation and if Hillary was serious about wanting the BEST for our Nation she would bow out the race NOW where we can focus on the other candidates with MORE ETHICS and INTEGRITY?

2007-03-19 06:11:53 · 19 answers · asked by Stealth 2 in Politics & Government Elections

19 answers

AGREE, AGREE, AGREE 100% NO DOUBT ABOUT IT AGREE AGREE AGREE.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

2007-03-19 06:14:37 · answer #1 · answered by Sandy B 3 · 0 4

i think of that fairly some candidate's spouses marketing campaign for his or her applicants, if in keeping with risk no longer criticize the different applicants. the subject is that invoice Clinton gets lots extra media interest than the different spouses, by way of fact he became a former President. I purely desire that he and Hillary would not be attacking Obama and twisting his checklist in a manner this is similar to the Republicans speedy boating John Kerry.

2016-12-15 03:45:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Great quotes on the clitoons:

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true." - President William J. Clinton

"How strangely will the Tools of a Tyrant pervert the plain Meaning of Words!" - Samuel Adams, patriot

2007-03-20 04:01:43 · answer #3 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 0 0

Yes we can agree to disagree about that. When Bill Clinton travels around the world, foreign leaders treat him with respect, and tell him that they wish he were still in power. When George Bush travels around the world, foreign leaders make jokes about him behind his back. And let's talk about integrity and ethics: revealing the name of undercover CIA operatives; firing US attorneys because they are too zealous in prosecuting corrupt congressmen and defense contractors; lying about whether we are engaged in torture; lying about the reasons we are going to war. There is nothing that Bill Clinton did in office or out that even approaches the stink of the current administration. I'm not a Hillary supporter, but having a Clinton back in the White House would be a huge step up in ethics and integrity.

2007-03-19 06:20:16 · answer #4 · answered by rollo_tomassi423 6 · 4 2

Rail on, it's funny but Clinton's approval rating is way and above Bush's and it was even higher during the Lewinsky scandal than Bush's is now. Many of the American people are missing the relative peace and prosperity from the Clinton years. Many of them welcome the experience that Bill Clinton will bring to his wife's stay in office as President. I would suggest using more ethics and integrity when you set out to trash others. There is nothing but rhetoric and catch phrases in your questions about the Clintons, you can't do better than that?

2007-03-19 07:01:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Bush is a national embarrassment. We have been at war since the moment that illiterate piece of trash took office. The citizens of the United States have about as much privacy as people did in the old Soviet Union. The terrorists in the middle east found their reason to attack after Bush was put in office after the Florida fix and losing the popular election. He should be ashamed of himself..

2007-03-19 11:17:09 · answer #6 · answered by rp 4 · 1 1

Hillary is not electable. I don't think Obama is either, although he seems like a nice enough person. The party needs to find someone who's squeaky clean BUT has enough experience. Someone needs to remember the Carter fiasco before they start trying to elect another neophyte into office.

2007-03-19 06:16:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I agree with you. I think those who disagree are enemies of America and put their personal feelings above the safeguard of our great nation. They are also known as hypocrites.

2007-03-19 08:52:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

dear questioner
you do realise that "focus on ETHICS & INTEGRITY" would have meant not voting to re-elect the Bush administration as they had said there was evidence of link between Saddam & 9/11 & there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (BOTH FALSE ie lies)

2007-03-20 01:06:02 · answer #9 · answered by georgieporgie2005uk 3 · 0 1

I have a low opinion of the Clintons.

I would NOT want to see Hillary Clinton as president. Ever!

2007-03-19 06:24:49 · answer #10 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1 4

How would he cause any trouble for the country if he's just the First Husband? No one cares about what the president's spouse does. Just ask Laura Bush.

2007-03-19 06:17:16 · answer #11 · answered by tangerine 7 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers