English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I propose we all start using more aerosol cans, styrofoam with cfc's, and convert our cars over to freon.

We were told to stop using those things in the early 80's, as they were causing a new ice age.

So if we start using them again, will it balance out the climate?

2007-03-19 05:15:44 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

21 answers

Oh, man so many people have bought into all of this hogwash.
The "Ozone hole" was over Antarctica. Ozone is created by the sun shining on the atmosphere. The area of the earth that receives the least amount of direct sunlight? Antarctica! The hole gets bigger in winter and smaller in summer. In Antarctica, the days are 6 months long. Hello? Are any of you getting this? We never had the means to measure the ozone hole before. Now it is some kind of problem?

CFC's are heavier than air and primarily used in the Northern Hemisphere. How did they cause a problem over the South Pole? How did they get up to the stratosphere when they are heavier than air?

Don't you people see how you have been consistently lied to year after year from crisis to crisis? Nothing ever really happens but they have you hiding under your bed. They have you ready to sacrifice your rights to the almight gods of science. SAVE US OH ENLIGHTEN ONES! WHAT OTHER SACRIFICES CAN WE MAKE TO YOU SO WE MAY RECEIVE DELIVERANCE?

Just make sure you don't look at the man behind the curtain. You will be real disappointed.



.

2007-03-19 06:34:51 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1 0

No, we weren't told they would cause a new ice age. They were banned because they produce greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming. You are desperately confused.

A tip - before you make lame uninformed points, make sure you know what you're talking about. You can learn from this mistake by actually bothering to learn more about global warming before you spout off again.

2007-03-19 05:25:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

nah! we are very fortunate that we are nonetheless contained in the warming vogue, international cooling is more advantageous worse in which in person-friendly words few ought to proceed to exist. this so-called synthetic international warming is purely an invention to justify to regulate each thing. to concede international warming doctrine isn't some distance from committing a suicide and all of us be conscious of that except those morans. "Saving the Earth" isn't some distance from "Worship the Earth" putting forward we are below the mercy of mom Earth is a bloody paganism in which i in my opinion do not forgive.

2016-11-26 22:28:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Freon was banned from use because it was enlarging the hole in the ozone layer.

We need to do things that will slow down the carbon dioxide production that is causing the warming.

2007-03-19 05:32:10 · answer #4 · answered by dVille 4 · 1 0

there is no such thing as man made global warming...
can not be happening...

if we took all the people off the earth and everything they made.... the earth would still have ice-ages and would still come out of them... the earth is not a static place.. it changes from day to day.... before humans ever walked the earth we had 100's of ice-ages and 100's of heat waves that change the face of earth... north africa at one time was a jungle... long before humans walked the earth...
it is just the way of it... anyone that tells you we are in the middle of global warming caused by humans.. just remember in the 1970s they also had all the facts in and we would be in an ice-age with in 10 years.... they are fruit cakes and wackos... remember fun facts about co2... 186 billion tons are put in the air every year... 6.6 billion tons are from humans... around 90 billion tons are from volcanios.. and about 90 billion tons are from green dead things... so we dont do 10% of that plants do..or volcanos do.

2007-03-19 05:31:44 · answer #5 · answered by Larry M 3 · 0 2

Sorry, but the sun is causing global warming, just like Mars and Venus are warming along with us. Or are the Martians polluting their planet too?

2007-03-19 05:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not a good idea, as these substances eat the ozone layer, which filters out harmful radiation and prevents us from getting skin cancer.

2007-03-19 05:19:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It's clear you understand very well the science involve in global warming, just like creationist understand about evolution...

2007-03-19 05:26:24 · answer #8 · answered by Jose R 6 · 1 0

It is Clinton's fault. He left Reagan II a recession. The Iraqis should be happy they have the ability to support a slow bleed approach. They don't support the troops and want to cut and run. There is a liberal bias. Valerie Plame sent Joe Wilson to Niger after she gave Al Gore a million dollars under the name of her CIA cover operation so she was not covert. Global warming is a liberal conspiracy to bankrupt the country. Free market economics is the way to go. Why do you have freedom. We need more Jack's from 24 to help us win the war on terror. We need to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here. Liberals hate Christians. We need to build more prisons and put more police on the streets. We need a military with more weapons. Liberals are immoral.

So next time you wonder what it is they are going to say, just pick one of the above answers. Or you can turn on Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity that way you wont have to ask on here you can get it straight from the source.

2007-03-19 05:18:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

Freon as combustible fuel? I have to agree with the above, you must've failed HS science classes miserably..

2007-03-19 05:23:49 · answer #10 · answered by eatmorec11h17no3 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers