Why don't the con chickenhawks realize how foolish they appear when squawking such nonsense?
http://www.lies.com/wp/images/chickenhawk.jpg
2007-03-19 04:39:09 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Calling me a "chickenhawk"? LOL Yet another stupid bushbot that uses words he doesn't know the meaning of!
2007-03-19 04:46:42 · update #1
I am sober you gutless chickenhawk. Maybe you should get enough "liquid courage" in you to answer the question!
2007-03-19 04:47:31 · update #2
What have I done? Unlike you, I actually SERVED (USAF). STILL serve (Federal Law Enforcement Officer) since 1998. you're welcome.
2007-03-19 04:49:14 · update #3
Why bother to humiliate yourself by responding, but not even trying to answer the question?
2007-03-19 04:51:20 · update #4
"been there doen that"? LOL What kind of chickenshit excuse is that? I guess you'd only fight to protect your mom or wife once, then you'd screech "I served already" while some freak raped her! Wow, I PITY women with gutless turds like you in their life!
2007-03-19 04:54:14 · update #5
you are is you're not "Your", you stupid bushbot chickenhawk. When did you enlist?
2007-03-19 04:55:03 · update #6
Don't forget adulterer/draft-dodger/chickenhawk ted nugent!
2007-03-19 04:58:53 · update #7
It is ignorant (and incorrect) of you to assume that I am a "liberal" or support clinton. try again
2007-03-19 05:02:20 · update #8
"little league" and WAR? LOL nice try, too bad your weak anology doesn't cut it. HUDE difference bewteen you playing "little league" and putting your LIFE on the LINE and actually FIGHTING! No wonder you're NOT in iraq today!
2007-03-19 05:07:34 · update #9
USAF? Aren't they the guys who drop bombs on British troops in Iraq? The word is incompetent.
Real men fight on the ground, in the Army. You just flew a few thousand feet above the action.
Coward.
2007-03-19 10:02:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
President Obama is finding for an further $eighty 3.4 billion for protection stress operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a request which will stress the fee of the two wars to very virtually $one million trillion money when you consider that 2001.
2016-10-02 09:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I support the war and served my time in the last one
"sup[porters" of the war do not need to go to Iraq themselves, supporting the war isn;t just holding a gun in combat.. there is so many things one can do to support the effort without being out of country..Honestly not many ppl have done a whole lot to suport the war, car magents (made in china usually) , yellow ribbons and such are nice but they don;t actually do anything. The country is very detached from this , being a dissenter is the "cool" thing to do anymore it would seem, you don;t see anyone buying bonds, or volenteering time services or goods for the troops too much at all. as much as we see of this war, can almost watch it live on tv anymore compared to the old days, the true support is lacking, not many of us are sarcificing much at all in the effort
2007-03-19 04:47:28 · answer #3 · answered by lethander_99 4 · 10⤊ 0⤋
How can you libs even bring up Chicken hawks. Seriously. The man you admire the most. The last democratic President was the biggest draft dodging, pot smoker, woman abuser to ever be elected President. A little hypocritical IMO. Especially when ignoring the UN and starting a war in Kosovo. Please do some research before these leftist web sites completely brain-wash you.
2007-03-19 05:00:00 · answer #4 · answered by mbush40 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋
By your logic, you can't even support a little league team unless you're actually playing the game with them.
As others have pointed out - there are MANY ways to support a team.
...edit - it was YOUR logic I was using that says you can't support something unless you participate in it first hand, if you can't see the connection, you need to review your logic.
..and I am not in Iraq today because I'm a pregnant woman with floating knee caps and bulging discs in my spine - the military would never take me.
2007-03-19 05:05:53 · answer #5 · answered by daisyk 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I tried to enlist but couldn't due to physical issues. For one thing, I can't properly aim and shoot a rifle. I was luckier than my sister. She had Multiple Sclerosis.
So I did the next best thing. I became a military wife and enabled someone else to serve for over 20 years.
Even if my problems went away today, I'm too old to enlist now. I would if I could.
I did what I could to serve my country. What have YOU done?
2007-03-19 04:45:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 1⤋
I am a Conservative and I have served during time of war. From my experience there are more reps and cons in the military than there are libs. That is not to say that there are no libs/ Dem's who serve. Most of the people who cry the most over the war are people who have never been in the military or served anyone other than their selves.
Thanks for your service and we will just have to agree to disagree on this one.
2007-03-19 04:44:53 · answer #7 · answered by joevette 6 · 13⤊ 1⤋
You are a venom spitting angry little man. Too bad you never served in the military, nor combat and you could have perhaps channeled this anger in a real, constructive way.
As it is, you just rant and spit and people shake their heads and walk away.
2007-03-19 09:35:46 · answer #8 · answered by 9D4KHP 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You have a greater risk of death by "staying here". 40,000 Americans die in car accidents each year.
Fatalities of US troops are low in Iraq, only 3000 troops have been killed in the 4 years
2007-03-19 04:43:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 1⤋
I personally told you that chicken hawk stuff just work any more. You got to come up with a better argument if you are going to sway public opinion.
2007-03-19 04:45:30 · answer #10 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 8⤊ 1⤋