The Washington Post revealed the horrible conditions our veterans had to be exposed to at the Walter Reed Army Hospital in an article dated Feb. 18, 2007. Veterans and their families have recently testified that those poor conditions have existed for years.
If we indeed had a free press, why did it take so long to get the words out? Army personnel testified thst they were told by their superiors not to talk to the press but those facilities were not secret facilities and hundreds if not thousands of vets and their families have seen them so why didn't anyone complain to the press?
I'm not saying the poor conditions do not exist. I'm just wondering why no one had blown the whistle before and why the press would miss something that glaring. Were they (the media) too busy covering Brittany and Anna Nicole?
2007-03-19
04:28:10
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism