English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Time for change is 2008!

2007-03-19 03:46:54 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

18 answers

I totally agree!!!!

2007-03-19 03:55:47 · answer #1 · answered by mysweetluvie 4 · 2 2

Maybe it is time for a change. Don't you think we should be careful what we change to?::::::::::::::THIS WILL OPEN YOUR EYES by Paul Harvey
>
> Conveniently Forgotten Facts Back in 1969 a group of Black Panthers
> decided that a fellow black panther named...Alex Rackley needed to die.
>
> Rackley was suspected of disloyalty.
>
> Rackley was first tied to a chair. Once safely immobilized, his friends
> tortured him for hours by, among other things, pouring boiling water
> on him. When they got tired of torturing Rackley. Panther member
> Warren Kimbo took Rackley outside and put a bullet in his head.
>
> Rackley's body was later found floating in a river about 25 miles north
> of New Haven, Conn. Perhaps at this point you're curious as to what
> happened to these Black Panthers. In 1977, that's only eight years later,
> only one of the killers was still in jail.
>
> The shooter, Warren Kimbro, managed to get a scholarship to Harvard
> and became good friends with none other than Al Gore. He later became an
> assistant dean at an Eastern Connecticut State College. Isn't that
> something?
> As a '60s radical you can pump a bullet into someone's head and a few
years
> later, in the same state, you can become an assistant college dean! Only
in
> America!
>
> Erica Huggins was the lady who served the Panthers by boiling the water
> for Mr. Rackley's torture. Some years later Ms. Huggins was elected to a
> California School Board.
>
> How in the world do you think these killers got off so easy?
>
> Maybe it was in some part due to the efforts of two people who came to
> the defense of the Panthers. These two people actually went so far as to
> shut down Yale University with demonstrations in defense of the accused
> Black
> Panthers during their trial.
>
> One of these people was none other than Bill Lan Lee. Mr. Lee, or Mr. Lan
> Lee, as the case may be, isn't a college dean. He isn't a member of a
> California School Board. He was head of the US Justice Department's Civil
> Rights Division, appointed by none other than Bill Clinton.
>
> O.K., so who was the other Panther defender?
>

> Is this other notable Panther defender now a school board member?>
> Is this other Panther apologist CCow an assistant college dean?
>
> No, neither! The other Panther defender was, like Lee, a radical law
student
> at Yale University at the time. She is now known as the "one of the
smartest
> woman in the world" (and may well become the next president of the United
> States). She is none other than the Democratic senator from the State of
> New York----our former First Lady, the incredible Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>
> And now, as Paul Harvey said; You know "the rest of the story".
>
> Just a reminder as she runs for President

2007-03-19 03:52:46 · answer #2 · answered by just the facts 5 · 1 1

I think it would be Madam President. There is no reason why we can't have a woman president. Several Muslim countries have had women prime ministers, not to mention some of our European allies.

2007-03-19 05:23:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yeah. Guess what? Not going to happen. Hillary's odds are similar to that of an Albino Indian Elephant smoking a cigar and shaking hands with Robert Goulet on a private jet.

Rudy Giuliani is your next President. And it's kind of dumb to post a question and it's not really a question, but instead your opinion.

2007-03-19 03:56:33 · answer #4 · answered by true_wahoo 3 · 1 3

I'm looking forward to it.

"Just the facts" ought to change their name to "Just B.S." They spam that crap all over any question about Hillary Clinton and it's a flat out lie. Paul Harvey himself said that was a bunch of hooey - it has been debunked completely. Here everyone, read the debunking for yourself:
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/...

2007-03-19 16:32:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No because Hilary Clinton is a dirty lying piece of crud and will do anything to keep from winning the war or be elected . She doesn't care who she has to backstab to become president .She'll pull out and the whole reason we'll have fought the War in Iraq will be no point anymore and those soldiers died for this war but it wont matter to her, but what do you expect from a sleazy Democrat! Right?

2007-03-19 04:19:39 · answer #6 · answered by Greenday minority goodriddance 1 · 2 3

No not really considering the fact that Mrs. Clinton was running things when the one that was elected (by lying his way
into office I might add) was out playing with that woman he hired!

2007-03-19 04:49:59 · answer #7 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 1 1

It will be a blessing to be able to actually say the word
President and feel that it means something other than
Dictator--- oh, I mean "Decider"---- what is the actual
difference in those, anyway ?? I mean a dictator IS
"THE" decider ---is he not ?? Oh, well _____

2007-03-19 03:57:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

it depends on their qualifications, but if you are referring to hillary clinton, then no. Hillary clinton is not a suitable candidate. a better candidate would be Mrs. Rice, she is a powerful speaker, and a very good and persuasive politican. I would trust her in office, not hillary. you must look toward ones qualifications, not race.

2007-03-19 04:21:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Yes, only I think the correct term is "Madame President"

2007-03-19 04:10:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Are you referring to Mrs Bill Clinton?? Why would you want to do something stupid like that?? What has she done other than being married to Billiam?

2007-03-19 03:53:56 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers