Why is it that the most important decision of our country is decided by a hdnful of electorals?

Question

The truth is that, regardless of what the people might decide through their votes, the final sayso is in the hands of the electoral college. Our government is controlled by special interest groups and our decisions are made for us. 200 years ago our founding forefathers would have been enraged. What can we do though while everyone is struggling to survive in a country where money makes all the decisions?

Answer 1

The strength of this country has always been in our ability to overcome the status quo by voicing our opinions and expressing our beliefs. It is much more difficult to do this in an era where media outlets control information and corporations seem to have an unbalanced amount of influence on our representatives. Nonetheless, we do have access to more forums for expression than were available even 15 years ago.

With the creation of the internet, many forums have become available to get your opinion across to a large audience. Many people have access to computers, and blogs and discussion forums have become a great way to reach out to a large number of people.

We need to continue to talk about the problems in this country and try to stir up INTELLIGENT discussion on different topics rather than resorting to name calling and insults.

Thanks for asking this question. And, by the way, here is a site that discusses the electoral college and why it was created:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/faq.html#history

Answer 2

Okay, first of all, there have only been 158 instances where members of the Electoral college did not vote as they were asked to by the voters of their home state, and in no instance did those changes have an effect on the person elected. So that is not a worry. Second, our founding fathers would not have been enraged--they set up the systems guaranteeing special interest power. The whole "democratic" institution, as practiced in the U.S., is designed to keep power out of the hands of the public. In fact, the founding fathers would have been apalled at all that we do allow the public. If you check your history lesson, until 1913, Senators were elected by State legislators, not by popular election. It is a misrecognition to think that things are less open, less public, and less democratic than they were before. Again, our system of government, like all systems of government, was designed to aid and abet the desires of the powerful and wealthy. Note that the founding "forefathers" didn't invite any poor people, women, or minorities to the Constitutional Convention, or even to the voting booths for many years.

I'm not trying to paint a "everything is getting better" picture. I'm trying to dispute this notion that "things used to be better" and what we need is to "return to the good old days." Chcek your history books.

Answer 3

Yeah, Qwyrx, you really should read more history. Start with George Washington's farewell address, published in America's newspapers at the time. Washington was terrified that political parties and special interest groups (called "factions" in his day.) would undermine the democratic republic the founders had worked so hard to create. You should also read the Federalist Papers, while you're at it. Our founding fathers truly would be enraged if they knew how the Democrats and Republicans systematically deny political representation to all those who refuse to join their corrupt fraternities. It is absurd to imagine that the complexities of the modern world can be reduced to a single choice between two consorting non-Constitutional bodies of white-collar criminals.

The founding fathers created the electoral college because election results had to be carried to Washington DC on horseback. In modern times, the electoral college has become the Constitutional device that legitimizes denying real political representation to approximately half of America's citizens. There are really only two possible solutions to this perversion of democratic principles. We can either amend the Constitution to eliminate the electoral college and allow America to become a free and fair pluralistic democracy, or we can preserve the status quo and continue our sorry history of political oppression and abusive taxation without representation. I favor fixing the problem now, rather than waiting for the inevitable bloody revolution that will surely destroy all the founding fathers and the American people have worked so hard to create.

Answer 4

no remember if or no longer you utilize the electoral college does not replace the sour variations and the tendency for applicants to concentration on particular components. in case you turn to a right away vote device, you have applicants focusing very virtually completely on the cities. in case you turn to a district device, you have applicants focusing on the "conflict-floor" districts. in case you persevere with the electoral college, you have applicants focusing on "conflict-floor" states. and with the aid of all of those structures, you have people who disagree, each and every so often bitterly, on the themes. And in this new media age the place a single mistake or misstep is repeated and performed out a minimum of a various million situations over the internet, people replace into in basic terms extra polarized. So, in a observe, No. people divide the rustic. no longer the device.

Answer 5

i watch what I want to watch. fifteen-hundred Nielson Families don't mean s-hit but they do get it right with American Idol !!! every 4 years 60 million people vote for president. 60 million people watch the top rated show every week for twenty weeks each and every year. i think your priorities are screwed up..