English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do. Just think of all the women all over the world that are at the mercy of these monsters!! (especially in places like India)They are supposed to protect their female, not find ways to destroy her. Besides eliminating male aggression there should be a way that would make it impossible for them to experience anger since we all know too well that they cannot control their emotions.

2007-03-19 02:29:47 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

9 answers

not really...in my sociology class, males are "more" capable to be criminals but ofcourse there are some exceptions (women doing the crime). So i think eliminating aggression at birth for males won't end violence but probably lessen it. To add, genetics aren't only the reasons why some males are aggressive, consider the environment they live in. :)

2007-03-19 02:35:53 · answer #1 · answered by Chicken Noodle 2 · 0 0

no and no.

Not all violence is due to male aggression. Much of it is from survival and family protection instincts. Only small scale violence such as domestic disputes are from male aggression. The other instincts are what make up the other conflicts.

They call the enemy evil say the reason he is there is that he hates you and your way of life, but in truth the soldier across the field from you is just like you. He is doing what he feels is right and trying his best to make the world a better place for his family.

Sadly what is good for one group is often bad for another. So since very few people will put the lives of strangers before those of friends and families they will fight for there side.

There will always be cases of not enough resources. To put is simply if there are 20 people on and island and enough food and water for 10 to survive would you be willing to let your family die so some strangers kids could live? I know if I was there with my nephew was there with me i would do what ever it took to make sure he had food. Survival and protection of kin is human nature and if you got rid of that part I have a feeling our species would not survive more then a few generations after that.

2007-03-22 04:17:06 · answer #2 · answered by thatoneguy 4 · 0 0

You're crazy! Women are the main reason men lose their mind! Just remember who ate the apple and then convinced us to take a bite! If you want to end male aggression get rid of all the women! (just kidding ladies, most of ya are ok in my book). And when it comes to controlling emotions men keep themselves together much better than women. Women cry a lot - is that control? As long as there's testerone men will be aggressive, so if you want to make a change grab a pair of scissors. Now that's what I call aggressive!

2007-03-19 09:36:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It have nothing to do with males, its all the fault of females keeps on opening their legs for no reason. Aggression is not based on brotherhoods or sisterhoods, mostly is the cause of racism, religions and culture.

2007-03-19 09:42:58 · answer #4 · answered by Walt. 5 · 0 1

most people dont fight because of agression, unless they are watching a game. i think if we got rid of liars, cheaters and unfairness then violence would end

2007-03-19 09:47:35 · answer #5 · answered by Jahpson 5 · 0 0

Um, have you ever seen two women fight? They are more savage and blood thirsty than most men!

2007-03-19 09:35:12 · answer #6 · answered by Mike 4 · 1 0

wouldn't you eliminate all sports then too? and what woman wants a man that is weak and boring?

2007-03-19 09:32:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

there is no way it is in our genes

2007-03-19 10:02:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No and NO

2007-03-19 09:33:17 · answer #9 · answered by naseldrip 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers