LOL at you sky is falling people. Fletch? McGahee? Fletch was only good for making tackles 5+ yards downfield. He was a liability against the run and is slowing down, keeping him would've been a big mistake. Those who cling to the past will never have a good future.
As for McScrewher, he couldn't hit any holes...well, at least on the football field. Average speed, average power, poor vision, poor hands, zero dedication. A-Train will easily replace him behind our much improved offensive line, and that's before the draft.
The only one worthy of concern was Clements....but would you pay him $80 million? 'Cause that would just be horrible. CB IS NOT IMPORTANT IN A COVER-2!!!! Indy won the Super Bowl without a shut down corner, just a bunch of above average corners. We pay him that much and our FA period is done then and there. I'll take $75 million worth of linemen anyday, thank you.
In any case, all of this is pointless because the draft isn't for another month. We'll have a much better idea then and even still nearly nothing actually is what it seems on paper. We weren't supposed to be any good last year, yet we were sniffing play-offs. This year, we'll make the playoffs. Just watch and quit listening to the idiots on ESPN who measure small market teams they've watched twice on how many "name players" they have....
Oh, and the NFL stopped doing schedules based on records years ago. Just like last year, we have one of the toughest schedules in the league, even compared to the other teams in our division...
2007-03-19 05:50:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Elminster 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes there is a chance. Jauron is a good coach. Sometimes things just click for the teams that cannot buy championships and the right combination of skills just happens. QBs have killer years, wideout catch everything. The line becomes dominant. I have come to believe that running backs are not nearly as important as they think they are and O lines make even average backs look great. Evidenced by Bettis having such a long career in Pittsburgh, it was very much about the tradition there of having great O lines. Its the same with QBs, Jake Plummer was a very good QB but if he had no pass blocking he could not play. In Pittsburgh he might have been a Hall of FAmer. So the Bills have a shot and you won't know until the season starts and see how things jell. You gotta stay in there with your team though good or bad.
2007-03-19 02:34:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tom W 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
LOL! bulls did no longer even get to the third around in the process the 1994 playoffs. pippen became a super participant at that factor yet he wasn't only the pass-to-guy style for the bulls at that factor. the reason of their fulfillment became because of the fact they have been a nicely balanced team. the subject became, therre became no guy who'll score in streaks for the bulls. pippen became greater advantageous on the protecting end extremely than the offensive end. plus, if pippen became better than jordan, he might've gained yet another identify or so after jordan retired 1998. yet he did no longer correct? and did he gained any scoring titles? he did no longer. the closest he have been given to prevailing a championship became the year they lost to lakers interior the western convention finals in game 7.
2016-10-01 04:07:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO WAY... I bet tall money every year on the NFL so I know to keep it real. And the bills stand no chance of having anything near a winning record! They couldnt get an 8-8 record with those high level players. Losing them even with a great coach wont pull them to a 8-8 or better record this year..
Maybe the year after though, but hard to say nowa days with free agents and such.
2007-03-19 04:09:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ty Elliot 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Not unless they get a running game - say what you will about McGahee but he was a running threat. Who's the starting RB right now? Will it be addressed through the draft? Only time will tell.
2007-03-19 04:34:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by RichMac82 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i say the bills will do worse than the raiders next yr. no running game+ very bad q.b.+ loss of clements and fletcher= disaster. without a decent running attack, it will be very hard to establish the pass. even if they did have a good run attack, losman is a bad qb and evens is inconsistent. their defense is gonna struggle getting off the field. opposing offenses are gonna lite up that d
2007-03-19 07:13:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by None B 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
They are still in what has turned out to be a very slow rebuilding stage. They will inherit a soft schedule due to last year's 7-9 finish and should finish low less than the same in 2007. They need to pick a course and stick with it.
2007-03-19 05:19:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The may fall a game or two short. There is still a lot of work to be done with that team.
2007-03-19 04:51:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Jim Kelly comes out of retirement and plays like no tomorrow.
2007-03-19 09:50:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no they will not make .500
the best is 7-9
they lost to many talented players, so theres no way they can improve from last season
2007-03-19 11:08:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋