There's a difference. Presidents are ELECTED. Everyone who voted should be entitled to praise/criticize their elected officials. I happen to support President Bush but those who don't are entitled to their opinion (assuming they got off their rears and voted).
Abortion is largely a "woman's issue" because the entire process involves her body and her decisions. The father should probably have some say in the issue but that's not likely to ever happen.
Military service....I have to say that it irks me to no end to hear someone espouse an opinion on anything involving the U.S. military who's never served. It's an ALL VOLUNTEER force! If you haven't worn the uniform, keep your pie-hole shut!
2007-03-19 01:42:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I am beyond criticizing Bush. I want to see that man behind bars. Its time for the public to take their Power Back. Bush has in his terms turned the mighty republic/democracy that is the USA into a true oligarchy turned kleptocracy and now starting a facist state, I just hope the masses are intelligent enough to get educated and put a stop to this.
2007-03-19 08:46:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by contractor 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've seen some incoherent commentary on Yahoo! Answers politics, but this is top of the list. What are you saying?!?! That some people have an argument that you disagree with? And then you label it with cute attempts to bash liberals, that don't make any sense either?
You clearly need a civics lesson: this is America, and you're allowed to have an opinion on ANYTHING. I happen to agree that while men can say what they like about Abortion, it's a woman's choice. The end.
Now if I were of your tiny mental stature, I'd end by saying, "looks like another Conservitard incapable of putting together thoughts without generalizing to the point of falsehood or name-calling." But I won't do that.
2007-03-19 08:42:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Silent Kninja 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Wouldn't you agree with me that the ever increasing police state Bush and his supporters are pushing over the nation without a just cause is a reason to be critical? This affects me, not Mr. Bush and I don't need to be a president to criticize what affects me.
2007-03-19 08:49:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Shouldn't Bush have been in a war before sending troops into Iraq to die for Halliburton? I'm a veteran, so I guess I get to criticize the Commander-In-Grief.
2007-03-19 09:22:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by theoryparker 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have been more critical of our Presidents, since we have accepted to call them by their last name instead of by their title Mr. President or President Bush.
Our lack of respect, beginning in the home since around 1962... has gone clear to the Presidents office.
2007-03-19 08:41:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cook C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
A non driver can see the choice of a drunk driver and know that was a bad choice. Same goes for a Nation or World that sees thru the lies and deception.
We all don't have to be a President to recognize bad choices.
2007-03-19 08:40:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Charlooch 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
There were US presidents, like FD Roosevelt and Harry Truman, whom I believe would have been very critical of the Bullshit Father and Son, as well as of the Filthy One (Penis Clinton) had they lived today.
2007-03-19 08:41:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Whoever said that to you was grasping at straws for a legitimate argument. Bush supporters have nothing else to grasp now but straws.
2007-03-19 08:38:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Enigma 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Your logic is flawed. You only talk about women and soldiers. All AMERICANS are entitled to have an opinon about their President and this one is a joke.
2007-03-19 08:40:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Debra D 7
·
0⤊
2⤋