Whenever a 3rd Party Presidential Candidate manages to get on 40+ state ballots...shouldn't this Candidate be included in all national televised debates?
2007-03-19 01:23:21 · 6 answers · asked by HisServant 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Absolutely, the mainstream alphabet media should be ashamed of the way they exclude 3rd party candidates from participating in Presidential politics, especially considering the way they themselves pontificate about their own holy 1st amendment rights.
2007-03-19 01:29:49 · answer #1 · answered by Like, Uh, Ya Know? 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes. In previous elections, a number of parties (Green Party, Libertarian, Constitution, whatever party ticket Nader's on) have managed that level and not been included in debates. The national press coverage is biased toward the two major parties, making it very difficult for minor parties to get attention.
2007-03-19 13:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by JerH1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. We need a third Party in the debate any way.
2007-03-19 08:50:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes I think so he has the attention of many voters and should be heard on a national forum
2007-03-19 08:32:42 · answer #4 · answered by wildirishrose19522000 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt have a problem with that!
2007-03-19 08:36:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
regardless of who he is
2007-03-19 08:29:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋