I believe that they are adopting these children to prove to the world that they are good people. In a way I imagine they are justifying their multimillion dollar pays checks. Celebrities go out to these impovished countries and give them millions of dollars to aid them and that makes them look good in the public eye. The win the hearts of Americans by doing a good deed such as adopting a child or building an orphanage. So when a movie comes out people will see the actors in a new movie and think to themselves-"oh I like her...she is such a good person" and buy more movie tickets, thus giving the actors more money.
Dont get me wrong all I'll for adopting, but my point is that there are needy children all over the world-even in America and the affluent countries...but we seem to forget about them. I wonder would it make news if a British rock star adopted an American baby from poverty as opposed to a Ethopian baby...
2007-03-19 03:54:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by brideofsatan_1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
nicely, in international locations like uk and the States, the waiting checklist for adopting youthful little ones are phenomonally lengthy. i be attentive to there are older young little ones finding for families yet people do no longer desire young little ones with bags that could desire to prove difficult.. so they bypass to 0.33 international international locations... in my opinion i've got not got a project with it... i do no longer see why absolutely everyone might have a project with somebody of wealth, adopting a baby that could desire to probably ideally be stated in poverty... As for helping the country itself, there are lots of charities that try this, and we could face it, how a lot of those charities supply the money they assemble over to deprave government officers rather of giving it directly to the inhabitants... I enroll in Amnesty international and that i be attentive to each thing I provides them is going promptly on help... Others like the crimson bypass and the french scientific one, (can no longer think of of the call) do an undesirable lot in the 0.33 international...
2016-10-19 01:45:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would imagine it has something to do with the fact that their lifestyle precludes them from the adoption standards in the west. The rest is just publicity
2007-03-19 01:37:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Peter A 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-03-19 01:24:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by naseldrip 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its the latest fad. I feel sorry for the kids when the novelty wears off.
2007-03-19 01:42:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes for publicity purposes!!!
2007-03-19 01:32:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mu f 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
publicity?
2007-03-19 01:24:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by enitsirhc21 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
For attention! Duh!!
2007-03-19 01:24:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Littlemiss Me 2
·
0⤊
0⤋