True or false... USA landed on the Moon. Why or why not?

Answer 1

well, i would say no. But I watched a show on National geographic yesterday that disproved all conspiricies. (the shadows, no stars in the pictures, etc.) But The One BIG thing they didnt talk about is that we had barely enough technology to go into space. I read that 12 days before the shuttle went into space, (ok not 12 days but it was relativley close maybe 2 or 3 weeks i forget) they had a practice test with a apollo shuttle that was the same and when they tested it on earth it flew up, and then lost controll and burst into flames.

I'm a bit undecided for that question though.

Answer 2

Yes we went, its true. The conspiracy theroists are grasping at straws here. They sound good until you really look at them. I've hears some people claim even make the claim that there is no gravity on the moon, such a completely false statement. I love the lander theory. If you speed it up it looks like its on earth, until you look at the dust, it flys in a perfect arc which would not happen on earth in a atmostphere. If this had been on Earth you would see dust flying around as it encounters the resistance from an atmosphere.
If it was a fake then they had better special effects than what we can produce right now which I find highly unlikely.

Answer 3

Of course they landed on the moon.

1. The distance between earth and moon is regularly measured by bouncing a laser off a device left on the moon by the Apollo astronauts.

2. It would have been impossible to keep such a secret from the thousands of people involved at NASA and from all the sub-contractors.

3. All the so-called conspiracy photos have been systematically and comprehensively torpedoed by people who actually know what they are talking about (rather than spotty adolescents lurking in the half-light of their bedrooms).

.......................I could go on, but I think this question has been answered so many times before.

Answer 4

The USA landed on the moon. We engineered and financed the flights in our bid to compete with the Soviet Union after the launch of Spudnick (didn't spell that right) in the late 50's.

We helped to launch the space race. There's evidence that Neil Armstrong landed on the moon. And the conspiracy theorists aren't convincing at all, especially when they speculate that the moon is some kind of Hollywood set (fun, but not accurate).

Answer 5

Benjamin Franklin said it best "In order for three people to keep a secrete, two of them must be dead. The only thing harder than landing on the moon, is faking landing on the moon, and having so many people be able to keep that a secrete.

Answer 6

Absolutely real. I watched on TV as Neil Armstrong blew his line.
It was supposed to be "That's one small step for A man, one giant leap for mankind" . Armstrong left out the article "a" and changed te whole thing into idiocy. Every year or so, someone from NASA tries to retro-fit history to rehabilitate Armstrong's legacy, but 60 million people heard him blow it live.
Now, if NASA had faked the whole thing, don't you think they would have had their puppet get his frickin' lines right? If it was on a sound stage, they could have just yelled "Take 2!" and fixed it.
That's my two cents, anyway.

Answer 7

It's a hollywood phenomena, happened.