Dont get me wrong, something does smell fishy, but if this was to start a new world order, they could have did a lot more damage than 9/11 and if it was to get us in Iraq, they could have put a terrorist on the plane from iraq, or even have planted WMDs.
2007-03-18 22:14:48 · 12 answers · asked by james t 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
God bless conspiracy theories...
It does smell fishy, I agree, but the chances are that even if we knew the complete truth, people would still question it.
2007-03-18 22:26:36 · answer #1 · answered by Badgerer 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Having served in the military for 22yrs which is
working directly for the government , they have
several secret programs in place and projects to
see what the results would be. An example they
injected thousands of soldiers with a new vaccine
never used before to protect them from chemical
attact in Irag, come to find out now since checmi-
cals weren't used there have been many disorders
from the soldiers because of the vaccine used
and not really known of what the side effects
would be if chemicals were not used. Now these
same soldiers are getting limited care as to find
out the direct cause for their disorders. So un-
less you do not work directly for the government
you would not really know what lies deep down
inside this institution.
2007-03-19 05:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by RudiA 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
this was the time of the stock markety colapse ,itwould have caused more pain than the 911 and the resultant war destractions
was it enron at the time as well?
regardless many expected the big news to be the stock market bust and the fall in the dollar [sad man was going to sell his iraqie oil in euros for god sake cant you see the implications
world wide all recources are priced by the yanki dollar imagine it being worth nothing [it was expected to fall below half its going rate
911 is nothing compared to that one
noting that insurance companiies needed it to be an act of war [read your insurance documents to find out why ]
thing is after they too could have collapsed thus it was an act of war [insurerors saved]
govt didnt plan it but really could have prevented it but the neo cons thought it just might be the key to set israel free or unleash armogeddon
either way godswill or mans we fell for it
fight or flight lets great fools appear great leaders
2007-03-19 07:10:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I completely believe that the govt was behind 9/11. I am a veteran of the Iraqi war. The motive behind 9/11 is money and power, isn't it always? Think who got all the big money contracts overseas? Halliburton. Who runs Halliburton? I'll let you look that up :) We are slowly being stripped of our rights as American citizens, so that a select few will get even richer. Why did the authorities take out the bomb sniffing dogs from the towers 3 days before the attack? Instead of me rambling just search "9/11 made with loose change"
2007-03-19 05:29:29 · answer #4 · answered by amnkeefe 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I dont think the US government had anything to do with 9/11. I'm fairly certain it's been connected to The Taliban & al-Qaeda and not to any US institution.
BUT, despite the fact that they didn't cause it, our government certainly capitalized on it. They parlayed the war in Afghanistan & the war on Terror into a baseless war in Iraq and also used it to enact the Patriot Act (spying on US civilians), which is stripping civilians of their civil liberties, all in the name of anti-terrorism.
2007-03-19 05:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by The Proof Is In The Pudding 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i do suspect that the government conspired and premeditated the act.
the world trade centre was getting old and would then be a liability of sorts down the line. so then the spectacle would serve more than one purpose.
many things that governments do isn't told until they are no longer liable for wrong doing....like posthumously.
2007-03-19 05:29:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I can not and dont want to think the government is responsible for 9/11, thousands of people died, are people just looking for an excuse ?
If that was the case then it was mass murder... is this what people really believe.
2007-03-19 05:18:52 · answer #7 · answered by looby 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree with mardy. Bush really wanted it to give the US a reason to start war. They knew that they were going to attack. THE WHOLE WORLD WAS TELLING THEM. The link below gives all the proof you need.
2007-03-20 22:46:06 · answer #8 · answered by L3monDr0p 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reason to invade iraq for oil. US will control the world oil market.
Terrorist is no match for US intelligence
2007-03-19 05:24:12 · answer #9 · answered by anderson 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The wanted to implant fear into the populice so that they could start taking away our civil rights. We will soon be living in a police state. Learn some survival techniques.
2007-03-19 05:18:34 · answer #10 · answered by MardyMar 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋