lets face facts the rock and austin brought in ratings of a 5.9 while cena brings 3.1 for raw and batista 2.6 for smackdown sorry but austin and the rock made the attitude era cena and batista are the reason why the wwe sucks right now cena and batista are both hand me down champions adn the worst champions ever and if the rock or austin brock or goldberg were wrestling cena and batista would be wrestling on heat or velocity there are alot of champions better then cena
Buddy Rogers Bruno Sammartino Ivan Koloff Pedro Morales Stan Stasiak Bruno Sammartino Billy Graham Bob Backlund Antonio Inoki Bob Backlund Bob Backlund The Iron Sheik Hulk Hogan André the Giant Randy Savage The Ultimate Warrior Sgt. Slaughter The Undertaker Ric Flair Bret Hart Diesel Shawn Michaels Sycho Sid Steve Austin The Rock Mankind The Undertaker Triple H Kurt Angle Chris Jericho Brock Lesnar Eddie Guerrero Edge Rob Van Dam .CENA AND BATISTA WOULD NEVER SURVIVIE IN THE ATTITUDE ERA THEY WOULD BE NOBODIES THEY SUCK
2007-03-18 21:58:05 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
Brock Lesner and John Cena actually had a really good PPV main event match at Backlash in 2003.
Still, Cena isn't the best, and Batista . . . sucks.
2007-03-18 22:06:50 · answer #1 · answered by Dragon 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I agree with this, in fact I would say that Cena and Batista aren't even a 100th as good as The Rock and Stone Cold. When Rock and Austin used to be in wwe full time, I never missed a raw or smackdown for anything, If I was going to be home I taped it. Now I don't even care to watch wrestling and the only reason I watched the rerun of raw is because I heard that The Rock and Stone Cold were there and by the way is The Rock coming back to WWE now or what?
2007-03-18 22:14:19 · answer #2 · answered by HHH 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Your damn rite, Cena and Batista will never come up to the stakes of Austin/Rock/Bret & Lesnar.....
Brock was the real future of the company, but he screwed it. John Cena can get beer poured on his *** and The Rock can layeth the smackdown! on Batista's muscled up ***!
The only hope for a real future now is Randy Orton, think about it, he is really doing great. He plays a awesome heel and a hell of awesome face. Hope Randy wins the Money In The Bank at WrestleMania 23. He deserves it.
Cena & Batista were spoon fed all the way to the top cause the WWE needed superstars to hold their back.
Cena doesn't deserve to beat Shawn at WM23, and worst comes to worst, if Batista beats Undertaker, if I could be at Detroit, I would riot. Undertaker doesn't deserve losing his streak at all, he has done a LOT for the company and has to rip Batista off the World title.
Undertaker,15-0, World Heavyweight Championship in hand at WrestleMania 23. If The Undertaker loses, The Phenoms Death Crew at Detroit shall riot!!!
2007-03-19 00:01:33 · answer #3 · answered by Cable 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
your research being right, then these guys are another era. both of these champs are young so the attitude hasn't fully developed yet.
but you single out a couple of guys because they happen to be the top dogs now. it follows that the whole stable is mediocre.
part of the problem is that the wwe either bought the competition or otherwise disposed of them. therefore the reigning champs become big fish in a small pond.
aside from this mutual admiration get together i'd have to say, no matter who was the best i do still enjoy watching wrestling.
2007-03-18 22:13:48 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Cena will never be the next Austin, Rock or Hogan no matter how much Vince crams him down the public's throat. And Batista is just a fluke champion. He became very popular during his feud with HHH 2 years ago and he's been living off it ever since. Why the crowd hasn't turned on him all together is a mystery.
These two roid monkeys are just living proof that Vince has no connection with his fanbase these days.
2007-03-19 02:00:47 · answer #5 · answered by startgame29 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
you are correct. neither of them have any wrestling skills, let alone wrassling moves. batista as pointed no f*cking charisma. dude is boring. Cena is a side show. he will always be a side show. his finisher is weak and boring. neither wrestlers have any pazazz to take the company further. I haven't watched wrestling in years, but then I tried to get back into watching it lately. started buying dvd's and catching shows. the wwf....I mean wwe is really boring. it's like watching wcw all over again. the wwe has alot of sorry wrestlers with stupid gimmicks. I'd rather watch Jericho and HBK wrestle all day. Or watch Rikishi stink face Stephanie or watch him do his sit-down piledriver on Kurt Angle. that TNN sh*t is also pretty gay. corny *** gimmicks. f*cking they should bring back the Oddities and make one of them retards a champion while they're at it. WWWF x .2 + eric bishoff =WWE= lame
2007-03-18 22:21:34 · answer #6 · answered by blakpala8 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
ok, so they are no longer Stone chilly and the Rock, yet the two Batista and Cena have had respectable fits of their 5 years in the WWE. as a question of certainty, i do no longer see them attempting to be them in any respect. yet I do agree that somebody else desires to be pushed to the main superb as nicely.
2016-10-19 01:38:14 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree. cena always seems like he's trying to hard to be likeable and batista has no charisma and he has no personality. the rock was the greatest wrestler in terms of entertainment in my opinion. austin a close second
2007-03-18 22:03:28 · answer #8 · answered by jinx12 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree and you mentioned Bob Backlund more than once, lol, just thought I would point that out to ya.
2007-03-18 22:01:41 · answer #9 · answered by revman_237 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have to agree with you...i miss the attitude era! Those were the best days!
2007-03-19 21:27:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋