I have XBOX 360 and its excellent, especially xbox live, i don't know why anyone would want to spend so much on a console, like the ps3, when blue ray isn't even going to take off!!!!!
2007-03-18 21:16:26 · 18 answers · asked by Cap10kirk 3 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Games & Gear
They say that Fight Night looks better on the PS£ what they don`t say is its out a year later and costs double the price. If you use caps shifts you will notice the pound sign instead of a 3 very appropriate. Sony does have better looking launch titles what they don`t say is they look no better than current 360 titles. I usually own the latest games machines but can see no reason to buy a PS£ tho I may get a Wii. If anyone is thinking of buying a next gen machine get a 360 you can also purchase a Wii and its still cheaper than the Sony option. By the way all the games i think look great on the PS£ are also on 360 yet the 360 has a lot of AAA games you will not find on other formats. Halo 3 needs to come out as in yesterday tho, and the moronic comment about playing PS2 games on a next gen machine yeah lets pay £500 to play games that look like there on a megadrive real clever. Have to say this the reason the clown above didn`t see any HD players is he was in a Sony store ..........please
2007-03-19 01:45:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Has Bill Gates been on here while I was out? What is this crap that there are not enough games for the ps3? It's backward compatible for both ps1 and ps2 games. Have any of you seen blu-ray? Go to your local electronics shop and take a good look at the Sony Bravia. Without doubt, the best picture on any television anywhere. Hook up a ps3 and be amazed. Yes it's a very big investment. But one that you won't need to change for years. And yes, I do have an xbox and an xbox 360, and they are both very good, but I was less than amazed at the performance levels of the 360, which is hooked up to a Bravia. Blu-ray will take off, because once you see a movie like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory on it, you just won't be satisfied with anything else. Also, the 360 was nearly $900 without Blu-ray, an inferior cooling system and still only four controller maximum capacity. As for online play, you do realise that the ps3 is also an online browser, don't you? Before you cast stones, perhaps you should do some actual research. After the debacle of Vista, I'm surprised that Bill is still in business, but then again I'm a Mac user.
2007-03-19 08:05:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
The xbox 360 is gonna kick *** FOR SURE just look at the games . Also the online is the best social expieriance you can get via gaming. The PS3 is more of a wild card. It has potential but it keeps selling out its exclusive titles making it less likely to sell. Also its got a seriously lacking library of worthwhile games. Its online expeiriance MAY be good its hard to say while its graphics are good most of the time. But so far its just been doing very poorly giving anyone any reason to buy it. I would definatly get a 360 because the 360 not only has better games , online, and just an overall nicer expieriance but it is a little known fact that besides alot of the blu ray related stuff its got the ps3 outgunned hardware wise and alot of companies are looking into doing buisness with the 360
2007-03-19 04:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
whats all this about the PS3 being too expencive...wasnt the 360 the same price when it came out and dont you have to buy the HD DVD addon for the 360...and a cooler if tou intend to play it for extended periods of time or have it running non stop...in the PS3, BluRay comes as standard and it costs no more than the 360 did when it came out...the PS3 can also have up to 7 controllers connected wirelessly and isnt that 3 more than the 360? The 360 has been on the market longer than the PS3 so naturaly it would have more games out. and since when will BluRay not take off...I dont see many HD-DVD players on the market, Ive already seen a few BluRay players out there. All that is besides the point...GO THE WII!...and if you dont like them its probably cos you havnt played one, you dont need high def graphics for awsome gameplay...so dont knock it
2007-03-19 05:13:53 · answer #4 · answered by Jason A|retired 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's better to have an XBOX 360 than having to buy a Playstation 3. That thing is such a big rip-off. The Blue-ray system is not going lower than it's original price. Maybe a Playstation 3 is better, but it's cost a LOT of money.
2007-03-19 05:08:46 · answer #5 · answered by shazzwan i 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Xbox 360 is the best short term machine, better priced system and a wealth of games at reasonable prices. I love my 360 but will be interested in the PS3 in year or so when things settle down and we see what kind of playability the games have. Halo 3 is going to be a massive thorn in Sony's side. Should be interesting.
2007-03-19 05:11:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Xbox 360 is the ultimate video game system out right now. With Xbox Live there is no other online-competition. 360 has the best games, better prices, and best online service. Long Live the Xbox 360.
2007-03-19 04:20:14 · answer #7 · answered by aSchway 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hello,
I have played with both the xbox360 and the PS3. After getting the chance to play with both consoles i think the XBOX360 is by far the best, affordable and a lot of fun with online. I have had my xbox360 for about 2 months now ans have never been happier. I was waiting to the ps3 to come out but after getting to play on it last dec i decided this was not for me.
Thanks
Claire
2007-03-19 04:28:43 · answer #8 · answered by claireclaire1984 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
stay with the XBOX 360, playstation 3 cant beat XBOX 360.
2007-03-19 04:22:43 · answer #9 · answered by ashutosh_ruler100 1 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Why do you wantto buy xbox or a ps3? Both are worse than a computer.Well if you still want to buy out of those two, then just buy a ps3.
2007-03-19 05:14:22 · answer #10 · answered by Kushal the great 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋