English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-18 20:36:52 · 20 answers · asked by poopski 3 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

20 answers

Isn't this the Marriage and Divorce Category? And NO, he couldn't be impeached. That requires that he had committed high crimes and misdemeanors against the office of president, OR, successful conviction when charged with a felony; tho that trial, by precedent, could only be scheduled after he left office. But I'm sure a person such as yourself is well aware of the impeachment procedures written into the Constitution and that you're not just in the wrong section blatantly trolling for support for your flaccid opinion...

2007-03-18 20:46:45 · answer #1 · answered by annoyed_with_the_other_answers 3 · 1 3

Love the people who think Bush and his cronies are just doing a 'bang up' job protecting us. What a JOKE. Pull your head out before it's too late and we've lost all our rights, and the government is completely taken over by the neo cons! Bush should be impeached. It will take time, effort and information that is finally coming to light. It MUST be done eventually, or our democracy pays a much higher price.

2007-03-19 03:52:30 · answer #2 · answered by PacificArts72 2 · 3 1

President Bush should be impeached because he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors, as set forth in our Constitution, and because his abuses of power are so serious, and so subvert our democracy and so threaten it, that action has to be taken to preserve our democracy and hand it down to future generations intact. I think what you have is a President who has repeatedly and in various ways put himself above the rule of law. And then secondly, as with the handling of the war in Iraq, he failed to take care that the laws were faithfully executed. In other words, he’s turned away from carrying out his basic responsibilities as President. So in some cases, he puts himself above the law, and in some cases, he runs away from the law. So yea he's a POS in my mind....

2007-03-19 04:00:21 · answer #3 · answered by Sarah 3 · 4 0

All those lunatics that think he should be impeached are just sore losers and don't know what the articles of impeachment are about. Your boy lost the last two elections. Get over it and try doing something like "reading" the constitution.

What high crimes and misdemeanors has he committed? Please name them and cite the law when you do it. I didn't think so.

What "rights" has he taken away? You libs love spouting that stuff and shooting from the hip but when it comes to actually naming those "rights", you can't actually name them.

2007-03-19 06:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I think America should be impeached.

2007-03-19 04:33:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not sure, a part of me says,"Yes." Another part says,"No."
I don't think he should have jumped the gun without the UN saying go for it. (Him or Tony Blair) But on the other hand- Somebody needed to stand up to those terrorize!
We should have by rights nailed Saddam in 1992- Dessert Storm.
Well when the chips all fall , who is going to speak up?
And if anyone else thinks they can do better- Than Have At Her!
Who really knows anyhow? And for all it's worth and one this subject, I like the man, he has balls.(Speaking form only)
Just one person view of this whole ordeal.
British Columbia, Canada

2007-03-19 03:50:56 · answer #6 · answered by Bluelady... 7 · 0 2

No lets let things get real crappy first so that the middle class joins up with the lower class and then we can rule the world and take the upper class money and run the good old USA the way its suppose to be run

2007-03-19 03:50:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No you can't impeach a president for being an old STINKY!!!!

2007-03-19 03:54:56 · answer #8 · answered by kitkat 7 · 1 0

No. Americans are so divided that it is a waste of time, effort and money impeaching him. However, he should be hauled to Hague by the International Community

2007-03-19 03:41:24 · answer #9 · answered by AdultMale 4 · 1 3

Why is this under Marriage and Divocrce section

2007-03-19 10:00:12 · answer #10 · answered by Confussedhere 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers