Given Iraq, support for an unpopular US mission, peerage for money...you prabably know more negatives than me!!
2007-03-18 20:26:30 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
As an American, I can say that I loved Tony Blair before he joined up with Bush. I do think he did a lot of good for the UK, but unfortunately, history usually does remember politicians on how they left office, and at the moment, Tony isn't doing to well. He's doing better than Bush, but that isn't saying much to be honest.
2007-03-20 14:26:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he will remembered as the worst Prime Minister. I think they should put a statue of Blair and bury it beside Nelsons statue in Trafalgar Square with a plaque on the ground saying "Tony Blair,the man responsible for dismantling Britain".
2007-03-21 05:01:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
why not, he is a good Prime Minister. As far as the war in Iraq, so many pityful people have let themselves be brainwashed by the Media. When the terrorist brings it to the US or where you live in a few years, then and only then will the brainwashed anti war people realize that they were wrong, deadly wrong.
2007-03-19 03:48:40 · answer #3 · answered by zack 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think he had some bad points, maybe more than his share, but brown will have more. he did quite well i think, everyboidey only remembers the bad things so its a bit unfair, for example he handled the bombings in london well, hes got the stuff on racism right and stuff like that, so he wasn't bad
2007-03-19 03:34:52 · answer #4 · answered by lawrence_deleeuw 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That have to ask little horror chucky and the were-wolves.
They have the answers.
2007-03-19 03:30:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but he'll also be remembered as the dummy's dummy.
2007-03-19 03:38:51 · answer #6 · answered by BOOM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋