i hate sceptisism. it realy seems pointless. sceptisism ultimately leads to solipsism. which is a stupid philosophy. because while it is logicaly consistent to itself it is still foundationless and is self contradicting.
there are also alot of theories that pretty much disproves solipsism. like david deutsches areguement and wittgensteins private alnguage arguement. and on top of that how is it that there can be no objective reality? the only logical explanation would be to say its an illusion created by our minds, but if that were true then how is it that we were able to conceive of an illusion if we had no prior reference to anything in order to create it?
so when it realy comes down to it how is sceptisism realy usefeul?
2007-03-18
20:14:08
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
theoryparker's: i dont mean that kind of sceptisism. i mean doubting the existence of your self and others. solipsism is necesserily incoherent and foundationless in order for it to make sense.
2007-03-18
20:57:51 ·
update #1