2007-03-18 20:09:39 · 3 answers · asked by xTzoX 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Other - Arts & Humanities
I would agree that in some degree, all art is interactive as mentioned above - but there are different levels of interactivitey -
your run of the mill 'traditional art', such as paintings and photography.
Then i have seen interactive instaltions, such as Marc Lythgoes work ( http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2007/skewed.view/lythgoe/ )
and then there are numerous works online that i would class and interactive art, i've always had a facination with mathmatical art (such as fractals) and find phong's work very interesting( http://astro.phong.com )
2007-03-18 23:25:56 · answer #1 · answered by Matt B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe all art is interactive. It causes one to interpret the creation of someone elses work which started with a spiritual impression turned thought then formed into a work of art.
2007-03-19 03:16:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Generally it means spectators are invited to add to the art rather than just view it.
2007-03-19 03:29:16 · answer #3 · answered by MissWong 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋