I truly appreciate this question.
To all those who give the token thumbs down to a question like this, or use the juvenile retort of "conspiracy-nut job," please, take some time to seriously analyze the unanswered questions surrounding the 9/11 attacks.
Interestingly, the burden of proof is no longer on the "conspiracy theorists" but on those who have stood by the government's official claim that 19 hijackers with box-cutters financed by Bin Laden, crashed 4 planes without any chance of prevention.
The following is irrefutable:
Fact: Bin Laden is NOT wanted by the FBI for the 9/11 attacks. Check out the FBI website. Reason? They don't have sufficient evidence to convict him. Perhaps this is why Bush said he really doesn't care about him.
Fact: There are hundreds of televised claims from that day that witnesses heard or felt explosions prior to the collapse of the towers. These include firefighters, police, newsreporters, and civilians.
Fact: 47 story - WTC 7, we are told, collapsed from fire alone. This was unprecedented for a steel frame building. Furthermore, it fell symmetrically in free fall speed. Science and deductive reasoning will easily support the cause of this collapse as demolitions. Fire does not have the energy to do this. Besides, Larry Silverstein declared on TV that they “pulled” building 7. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk )
Fact: The steel from WTC was shipped overseas before an investigation was even opened. This is the greatest destruction of evidence in the history of forensics.
Fact: Thousands of first responders have been afflicted and some have even died from respiratory failure. The government will not support investigations into the many reports which show that these heroes have micronized steel, glass, and concrete in their lungs. Fire, and the collapse from gravity would not produce this type of dust. Demolitions, however, supports the evidence.
Fact: We were told that NORAD didn't intercept any of the planes that day. This spans from about 8:24, the time of the first report of a hijacking, to 10:06, when the last plane crashed in Penn. NORAD's has a prior track record of intercepting planes within minutes. Standard Operating Procedure was not followed that day. They also changed their story several times.
Fact: The investigation into 9/11 was initially opposed by the Bush Administration. The 9/11 families pressed for one. They got it, but with remarkable conditions. The total costs of the investigation, including the NIST report, was only $16 million. The cost to investigate the Space Shuttle crash - $50 million. The cost to investigate Clinton - $42 million. In other words, the greatest failure of our defenses deserved less money than the shuttle and Clinton's perjury. What an insult to the 9/11 families.
Fact: No one has been fired for 9/11.
Fact: The spike in put options on Boeing, United Airlines, and American Airlines were never investigated. Millions are still unclaimed. This indicates someone knew. Why not check out this lead?
Fact: The August 6, 2001 Public Daily Briefing Memo was titled BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE IN THE US. Yet prior to its declassification, we were told by Rice and Fleisher that there were no warnings. Had this news been made public, couldn't travelers, law enforcement, and the airline workers have been a little more guarded or informed to notice something that day? Wouldn't we have guessed right away that the first report of a hijacking was indeed a terrorist? Or would we have dismissed it as "one bad pilot" and continued to read "My Pet Goat" while America was attacked?
The bottom line - If the deaths of 3000 people occurred under the control of a corporation, people would have been brought up on charges of criminal negligence. Despite the growing movement and mounting evidence into the WTC collapses, the government still has made up its mind that it is fire that brought these buildings down and that 9/11 was simply a failure of imagination. They feel no one is to blame. This was the conclusion they had prior to the investigation. What the 9/11 Commission produced is the anti-thesis of the scientific method. Much of the evidence was outright omitted by them since they determined the conclusion prematurely.
If you were an underwriter at an insurance company, or an architectural engineer, or a fire marshal, wouldn't you want to know what really happened in these buildings? If you were a pilot, or and FAA employee, wouldn't you want to know which NORAD employee stood down or messed up that day?
To dismiss the overwhelming evidence that explicitly shows how hundreds of questions remain unanswered suggests a cover-up by our government. Conservative thinking has taught us to keep government in check 100% of the time.
More and more people are joining the 9/11 truth movement. We are unstoppable. To deny the smidgeon of facts presented here and the many others unmentioned is akin to being like those who have denied the Holocaust. It's intellectually dishonest.
Go ahead and give this thumbs down if your patriotism is of the cheapest kind. Yours is the kind that our forefathers would have laughed at. They demanded that we question authority, as they did. Our Constitution provides us with the means to explore the truth and to keep the government in check. But even the Constitution has been threatened as of late.
So, give it a thumbs down if you wish to cling to your cheap patriotism and your unconditional loyalty to a president and a government that has demonstrated nothing but contempt for accountability, truth, Constitution, and most importantly - the 9/11 families and surviving rescue workers who continue to suffer.
Peace. And pray for the truth.
Source(s):
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7895306224389722116&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6606909833563454569&q=9%2F11+first+responders
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0scE7bQWdk
credit to Rob in NY
2007-03-18 19:50:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by gabriell_021 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
i have yet to see any evidence that 9/11 was an inside job. i have seen evidence of bombs being placed inside. i have seen evidence that the planes themselves probably could not have brought down the WTC but where is the evidence that this was an inside job. it reminds me of the movie Arlington road. there is a line that states that America likes to believe that terrorist acts were perpetrated by one psycho outcast of society who was either swiftly caught or preferably died at the scene and the threat is gone. when we find out that there is an entire section of the world a massive organized unit that does nothing but plot these attacks and carry them out we freak out we have no idea what to do so instead of truly understanding that there really are people this evil in the world we must come up with another scenario. the attackers could not have been THAT well organized to have also planted explosives in the building designed to detonate on impact. there could not possibly be a group this organized. so it must be an inside job. the easiest most likely scenario is usually the one that happened. it is just a scary fact of life.
2007-03-19 01:45:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by big_john_719 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why was Bill Clinton president after the stories in the Oval Office and Monica,besides being the biggest anti Second Amendment President ever. Why was Edgar Hoover head of the FBI, So determent to get Bonnie & Clyde than killing them. While he was crossdressing and Raping and Killing little boys from Boy's Town.Why is Edward Kennedy still a Senator after his Automobile Homacide. Now his son is following in his foot steps. I think I'd rather go hunting with Dick Chaney, than get in a car with a Kennedy. I could go on for eternity, But I hope you get the idea.
2007-03-18 20:25:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jimbobswayforme 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
I do not support the conspiracy theory. The US has/had a policy of supporting all kinds of rebels and Ben Laden was one of them.
The US never supported Mandela (or the ANC) when he was in jail. It was up to the socialist countries to help end apartheid. Carter was the first (and only?) president to seriously give the Palestinians any hope of a homeland.
2007-03-18 20:07:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by springday 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't really believe in the conspiracy theory's behind 9/11...however I have absolutely no idea why Bush is still the president. Thankfully though...08 is quickly approaching!
2007-03-18 19:46:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by evilbandit 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
I find it impossible to believe thsat 9/11 was an inside job, bush is stupid but reckless or that stupid.
2007-03-18 20:37:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by lawrence_deleeuw 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
The fear that the US gov't puts into people keeps him in office. No one wants to clean up his mess either, he got us into this insane war, he needs to get us out... the person that takes the office in 08 will have A LOT to work out that I pray for their sanity...
2007-03-18 19:49:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by G 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
When 5 million illegal aliens marched in the streets "demanding" citizenship, Were'nt we (America) ashamed at our paultry responses to this 2-party tyranny?
2007-03-18 20:39:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
9/11 wasn't an inside job, gomer.
2007-03-18 20:37:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by BOOM 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
The media is too afraid to raise it. Heck, they still won't even say the "I" word (impeach). A very large portion of our population wants W and his cabal impeached, you see it on signs, banners and protests, yet the media doesn't even touch it. Fear I guess.
And to think that this gov't was complicit in the 911 attacks hasn't even been investigated. Oh well, welcome to reality.
2007-03-18 19:48:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by lip11 3
·
1⤊
2⤋