/Condalisa Rice phoned the mayor of san fransisco the day before 9/11 and warned him not to fly why werent we?

Answer 1

Because if we were warned that would mean that they(our government) knew about it and should've/could've stopped it. However, they did know it was going to happen. And, considering how much they had to gain from it, I wouldn't doubt that they helped, if not masterminded, the whole thing.

Answer 2

JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES

http://www.wirednewyork.com/wtc/wtc_map.htm

Notice how building 6 stands between building 1 and building 7, notice how building 7 is in between the verizon building and the federal building.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_pan_si_01-clo.jpg

notice the distance between the buildings.

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_wtc0915_1280-clo.jpg

notice the damage to building 6, the crater type hole in the middle of building 6. yet it is not completly collapsed. There is very little damage to either the verizon building or the federal building. but right in between those buildings building 7 is completed collapsed! and the building that was in between it and the world trade center tower building has not completly collapsed?

http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/gbi.cgi/World_Trade_Center.html/cid_manhattan_before_si_01-clo.jpg

Are you really going to believe that the damage done to building7 caused a complete collapse. and not a complete collapse to building 6?

If seeing is believing here are the best pictures to see for yourself please look at them. be honest with yourself. and answer the question how is that possible?
So the offical story is, if you can believe it - that the building directly beside the WTC tower DOES NOT completely collapse. but the building on the OTHER SIDE OF BUILDING 6 DOES COMPLETELY COLLAPSE?

Answer 3

She didn't have your number. But Bush has it now.
Call waiting.

Answer 4

sources please