Have you read the skeptics to Global Warming?

Question

Read This!
"Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article lists scientists who have expressed doubt regarding the current scientific opinion on global warming.

Answer 1

I think this will become more and more prominant and ppl will realize that Global Warming/Climate Change is not as big a problem as some would have you to believe. A recent article in the New York Times has even asked Al Gore to stop all the hype:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?_r=1&oref=slogin That same article talks about Al Gore's claim that the oceans could rise 20 feet is exaggerated by 18.08 FEET! The latest UN study on the subject says the oceans could rise a MAXIMUM of 23 inches. Al was only 18.08 FEET off. That, my freind IS hype...

If you look up any global temperature chart on the net, you'll find the earth's temperature has only increased by about 6/10 of one degree (C) - that's 1.1 degree (F), in the last 125 years. So yes, the globe is warming up, but it's not overheating like some would have you to believe. http://data.giss.nasa.gov:80/gistemp/2005/2005cal_fig1.gif

The latest research shows that the methane from cows and pigs is a major factor in the increase of "heat trapping gas". It's actually 23 times more potent as a heat trapping gas than is carbon dioxide. http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/climate-change/science/other_gases According to the newest UN report on Global Warming, "Livestock are responsible for 18 per cent of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, more than cars, planes and all other forms of transport put together." http://news.independent.co.uk:80/environment/article2062484.ece

So if Al Gore and all the alarmists really want to do something about climate change, they MUST become vegetarians and shut down cow and pig farms. I mean seriously, if they truly believe that global warming is as disastrous as they are preaching then they need to stop eating meat, period! I doubt that will happen. If not, then they are the hypocrites that some of us already suspect they are.

Also Al Gore preaches to you to conserve, but he does not practice it himself. He uses 20 times more energy in his Nashville mansion than the national average. http://www.tennesseepolicy.org/main/article.php?article_id=367
One thing he has not learned is that you MUST practice what you preach... at some point you will get caught as he has.

Answer 2

They list maybe 20 people. For each one of them there are hundreds of scientists of equal stature who do believe the mainstream position.

And they don't have any ideas that haven't been considered and rejected by the mainstream. Not because of logic, but because a huge amount of available data supports the mainstream.

Could the skeptics be right? Sure. Is it at all likely? No.

Read this on the enormous degree of consensus. There's always a few dissenters.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/306/5702/1686

And these links address their arguments.

http://info-pollution.com/warming.htm#WEB

The scientists who criticized Gore didn't disagree with him on the basics; global warming is real, caused by us, and a serious problem.

"Typically, the concern is not over the existence of climate change, or the idea that the human production of heat-trapping gases is partly or largely to blame for the globe’s recent warming. The question is whether Mr. Gore has gone beyond the scientific evidence."

Answer 3

yes i have, Soon people will realise that the debate on global warming has evidence on both sides and is not as dyer as the media reports. As the opponents of global warming start to be herd more people will listen and make a more informed judgement and not just jump onto the Al Gore bandwagon because its popular But rather be be more proactive and informed on both sides.

Answer 4

Trevor, I in basic terms have not seen convincing evidence that international warming is real. In doing learn, I quite have discovered that those climate cycles have handed off in the previous, long before SUV's, jet airliners, etc. The severity of the California wildfires are a right away results of no longer allowing people to sparkling lifeless flowers for thier land. That will strengthen the gasoline load so whilst a fire does initiate, it has extra gasoline to burn. extra gasoline equates to extra smoke, co2 and each thing else that contributes to this alledged international warming. So in a feeling, you're precise. guy does reason international warming whilst he does stupid stuff like allowing extra components to burn needlessly. cut back the gasoline load and additionally you will cut back the quantity of poisonous gasses in the air. The fires should not be as extreme and that they are going to be extra undemanding to contain. The Kyoto protocol is widespread different than for one ingredient; the biggest polluters in the international, China and India, are given a bypass whilst it involves emissions controls. If we can freshen up our air, then each and every person could do their area as perfect as they might. it quite is equality. so some distance as Oxfam (despite the hell it extremely is), your fact says all of it; climate cycle. since guy has in basic terms been recording climate activities for the final one hundred twenty five years or so, who can extremely say what the climate replaced into like say for the period of the Rennaisance era, the Roman Empire, the rule of thumb of the Pharoahs or the like and use it as a assessment to todays climate. Get real. For all all of us comprehend, snowboarding replaced into great in Switzerland in 1532. do no longer comprehend, because of the fact no person ever recorded the intense and espresso temps for the day.

Answer 5

It is crucial that the earth change temperature and loose ozone. The natural process of evolution dictates survival of the fittest. Any species that turns out to be defective should be eliminated via this natural process. If a species defecates on itself, it is buried in it's own feces and dies. Other life forms take over having demonstrated they are the fittest. Homosapians are burying themselves in their own excrement and are clearly not the fittest. I agree, global worming is not a problem, bring it on!