English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it about fighting over property rights ? Is it about fighting over which religion is suppose to be the accurate way in serving Allah,God,Jehovah,etc?. Is it no secret that God has many names?Is it about what lesson the other must learn by shedding innocent blood?Do terrorist really enjoy thinking that this is the only way to get others attention in regards of teaching others their religion and beliefs? Or just is it that all
terrorist are cowards and are ashamed of themselves only living out just how they have been brought up, and they don't really even give a dam about themselves ,nor their children, nor their children's future to stop all this fighting so that there can be change made to better themselves to live in peace and harmony instead of destroying everything not to mention others homes and by destroying their hearts by killing their family members and their children.You know a child is only a reflection of their adolescence! Please tell me whom is to teaching whom?

2007-03-18 18:22:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

15 answers

I believe the answer is economics .you do know how much those missles and bombs cost and they must be used before there self time expires. the excessively wealthy are said to have the influence over such matters and they claim in many a university economics classes that only a handful of men posess the power and wealth to command a war over the president from under the table.I for one seriously don't doubt that this is possible if not probable.
"Peace cannot be kept by force; it can only be achieved by understanding. "
Albert Einstein

2007-03-18 18:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0 1

it may be the honourable project to do even regardless of the indisputable fact that it is not at risk of income backing or help. not all of Islam is anti-females. however the ultraconservative variations, females have not have been given any rights in any respect. saved in servitude, estimated to be neither viewed nor heard, unable to have their very own money, unable to artwork or be certain no count if or to not have little ones & unable to pass away their homestead with out a male relatives member for an escort in any respect cases. in reality each and all of the privileges females right here interior the West have rights too & seen ordinary, should not be allowed in an unlimited majority of the midsection East. females are 2nd classification electorate & it fairly is precisely how the menfolk like it.

2016-12-19 08:38:15 · answer #2 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

Richard Nixon wanted to prevent another Vietnam. George W Bush (the 43rd president dude) sure didn't take his advice. Bush wanted to get the weapons of MD... there wernt any. That was his only goal in Iraq in 03 but now we had to kill Sadaam and his family, now we need to bring peace to Iraq.
WE NEED TO LEAVE IRAQ!!!! WE ARE SACRIFICING INNOCENT LIVES FOR A TEMPORARY THING. WHEN THE USA LEAVES IRAQ, THAT COUNTRY WILL TEAR UP IN WAR AGAIN. AND WHOSE GONNA PUT US RIGHT BACK IN IRAQ???? We need someone who cares enough for the US and Iraq... if we keep spoon feeding Iraq soon the spoon will become the dinner plate and soon Iraq will become our problem for the future. We need to leave Iraq alone. Enough said.

2007-03-18 18:36:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The leader of the United States, not unlike many before him, is trying to teach the world how much better our way is. Before him, only look back as far as Ronald Reagan. When Qaddafi drew a line in the sand, Reagan blew up his house, and we haven't heard much from him since. Although he is now considered the moderate in the region. More importantly, thanks to Ronnie we no longer have to live in fear of communism. DON'T YOU SLEEP BETTER NOW THAT THE WALL IS DOWN???

2007-03-18 18:33:31 · answer #4 · answered by Fallon 2 · 1 0

i think its all about who is superior and the stuffs like that..
misunderstanding,misconception and all other misses... you see,you can't fix a mistake with another one..i think both parties should realize that... it could also be religion,politics and dominion over something.
you may have a point about terrorists being coward and all but take a look on the other side of it..i mean have you talked to one? they may have some valid reasons for themselves but still valid reasons that aren't enough to be the reason for killing innocent lives...

2007-03-18 18:29:45 · answer #5 · answered by mysticbluz 2 · 1 0

We are making more terrorist! And if we attack Iran, 9/11 will look like a midget compared to what we will unleash!

2007-03-18 18:26:32 · answer #6 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1 0

Just living human kind with lost sense of direction and purpose of life in planet of apes.
Were having communication problems in one new universal language and one speech in planet of apes.
With misinterpretation, miscommunication, communication failures and communication break-down that ended up in throwing pots and pans from a woman's errors from her kicthen of ancestor's custom in planet of apes.
That got everyone clubbing one another who is living human kind themselves like a cave-men in planet of apes.
Ever wonder why don't those dirty old men in office kick the butts of the three monkeys in their monkey suits who were blind, deaf and dumb for making a mess in planet of apes?

2007-03-18 19:34:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Religion and recent history have a lot to do with it.

Oil, money, and power also play parts.

2007-03-18 18:25:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Power, for some , oil for others .
Revenge and hatred for most .

2007-03-18 18:30:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We started the war, there were no terrorists.... bush made them up to scare people.... muslims are just like us,,, except they are beaten down by american imperialism and israel,,, suicide bombing is a noble thing when you are being pushed into a corner,,,,,, truly..... america is controlled by evil people.....

2007-03-18 18:26:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers