English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Gandhi once said, ”Nonviolence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.” Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, born on October 2, 1869, was born to a poor family in Portbandar, India. By the mid 19th century, Britain had conquered most of India's geographic and political regions, but eventually became economically dependent on India. However, for the people of India, this not only created a huge economic downfall, but it also caused starvation that killed 30 million alone. Coming back from his training as a lawyer from South Africa, Gandhi had witnessed many accounts of racism and unjust rule in Africa. Influenced by many authors and religion, Gandhi’s nonviolence resistance helped end an unjust rule in India. But what does “nonviolent resistance really mean? According to the Florida International University, nonviolent resistance means a “nonviolent struggle conducted by noncooperation, in reacti

2007-03-18 18:20:17 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Higher Education (University +)

this is the rest of the paragraph:

According to the Florida International University, nonviolent resistance means a “nonviolent struggle conducted by noncooperation, in reaction to a disapproved act, policy, or government.“ Gandhi used many methods of nonviolence resistance to end injustice rule in India. One of the methods was non-cooperation, which was the act of refusing to cooperate. To end unjust rule in India, Gandhi would also use boycotting as a method of nonviolent resistance. The act of peacefully violating a rule, civil disobedience, was another method Gandhi used to restore India’s rule.


Thank you.

2007-03-18 18:20:43 · update #1

8 answers

Looks good, but in the last paragraph, instead of the sentence, "One of the methods was non-cooperation, which was the act of refusing to cooperate." This sentence is, although grammatically correct, is basically an oxymoron. You are explaining non-cooperation as refusing to cooperate. You need to make a point with this sentence. As it is now, it has no point or reason other than the fact that Gandhi had methods. Your explanation of non-cooperation is not needed. Try something like this..." Gandhi used many methods of non violent resistance to end unjust rule to India. One of his many methods was non-cooperation. Gandhi found that boycotting, in a non violent, peaceful, civil disobedient manner, helped restore the rule of India." You see what I am doing here? Just play around with the words. You can say the same thing you were trying to say without having to say it twice. Hope this helps!

2007-03-18 18:43:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What you wrote is much more than one paragraph. And some of it sounds like you copied chunks from an encyclopedia. You need to organize it a bit more and put it in your own words. A good sentence to start with would be this:

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869, to a poor family in Portbandar, India.

By the way, did you know where Gandhi claimed to have learned the principle of nonviolence? In his words,

"I learnt the lesson of nonviolence from my wife, when I tried to bend her to my will. Her determined resistance to my will, on the one hand, and her quiet submission to the suffering my stupidity involved, on the other, ultimately made me ashamed of myself and cured me of my stupidity in thinking that I was born to rule over her and, in the end, she became my teacher in nonviolence."

2007-03-18 18:45:28 · answer #2 · answered by RE 7 · 0 1

firstly, it shld be Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born to a poor family in Portbandar, India on October 2, 1869.& ther shld be another sentence after that as u jst cant start from any where u like, it makes no sense. ur nxt snt. too makes no sense , yes the britishers used to take raw materials for their factories but that dint made them eco. dependent on us , instead it was the oter way round then it makea sense! then , it shld be like while he was in south africa he came across...., dear u mst write it all again it is not well organised & it makes no sense at all!

2007-03-18 18:33:53 · answer #3 · answered by tanvisha 2 · 0 2

Excellent! I found no spelling or grammatical errors...but other people may have input. I think it's an excellent essay

2007-03-18 18:28:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Leave 'alone' out. And the rest of it too. It's all mish mash.

2007-03-18 18:29:14 · answer #5 · answered by ravin_lunatic 6 · 0 1

yes there is 1 misspelled word you put reacti instead of react

but don't worry about it i misspell words all the time i had to spell check this answer

2007-03-18 18:35:58 · answer #6 · answered by Mikey L 2 · 0 3

BRILLIANT!

You lost me at: Ghandi once said,

2007-03-18 18:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by Jason102591 2 · 0 1

there is no mistake in the passage.. i checked it twice.. believe me...

2007-03-18 18:27:22 · answer #8 · answered by SSSting 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers